2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of network dynamics through network pictures: A longitudinal case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
84
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
84
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiple actors involved and the dynamic nature of networks mean that networks have features of business activity with non-predictable outcomes [11] and they cannot A Supplier Network Complaints Perspective be directed or controlled by a single company [11], [34]. Network activities are the result of the network structure, networking behaviour and network outcomes [8].…”
Section: Features Of Business Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiple actors involved and the dynamic nature of networks mean that networks have features of business activity with non-predictable outcomes [11] and they cannot A Supplier Network Complaints Perspective be directed or controlled by a single company [11], [34]. Network activities are the result of the network structure, networking behaviour and network outcomes [8].…”
Section: Features Of Business Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study of business networks has encompassed many different perspectives, for instance, network cooperation [1], network competencies [5], network learning [6], network strategy [7] and network management [1], [8], and many different concepts, e.g. network dimensions [8], network insights [9] and network dynamics [10], [11]. Recent research has tried to improve understanding of business networks through the use of network pictures [12], [13], which are different understandings of how business network actors subjectively comprehend their surroundings [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…about the relevant network horizon) (Holmen and Pedersen, 2003). Defined in this broad sense, network pictures can, for example, be used to trace the development of a whole network longitudinally (Ford and Redwood, 2005). However, in this paper we use network pictures as snapshots in time, and adopt a narrow perspective because we are interested in managers' sensemaking, i.e., how they explain changes.…”
Section: Network Picturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moller and Halinen (1999, p. 417) emphasize that knowledge generation about business networks is problematic for the firm, while claiming that in-depth knowledge can only be generated by taking part of the business network, that is, by having business relationships with (knowledgeable) counterparts. Nevertheless, the firm is able to ''make sense of'' the business network via network pictures subjectively devised by managers (Ford & Redwood, 2005). Network pictures are usually pictorial (more or less ''realistic'') representations of the firm's immediate context and of what is beyond the firm's network horizon (i.e., the ''visible'' or ''known'' part of the overall network) and constitute an important input in the decision making underlying the firm's networking processes (Henneberg, Mouzas, & Naude, 2006).…”
Section: The Embedded Firm's Context and Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%