2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137470591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Sense of Self-harm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the self-harming child is assumed to be, or be able to become, aware of the motives for their selfinjurious behavior. The self-harming child is thus shaped after a late-modern self that has control over its emotional life (Foucault, 1988;Steggals, 2015). But this also leads to an authorization of children's emotions and experiences as self-conscious beings.…”
Section: Joacim Strandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the self-harming child is assumed to be, or be able to become, aware of the motives for their selfinjurious behavior. The self-harming child is thus shaped after a late-modern self that has control over its emotional life (Foucault, 1988;Steggals, 2015). But this also leads to an authorization of children's emotions and experiences as self-conscious beings.…”
Section: Joacim Strandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are inter-related problems with many of the assumptions made about self-harm, problems which are compounded by the dominance of certain disciplinary perspectives, and by the marginalisation and compartmentalisation of others. Qualitative and narrative research with those who have self-harmed indicates a far more complex picture, with meanings, intentions, practices and contexts involved in self-harm each shaping what a 'relationship' with the practice entails (Brossard, 2018;Chandler, 2016;Steggals, 2015).…”
Section: The Context Of Self-harming Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical and lay contexts, self-injury is heavily stigmatised, commonly taken up as a maladaptive, morbid and pathological form of emotion-regulation, disproportionately plaguing women and girls in 'advanced' western societies (Gholamrezaei et al, 2017;Nock, 2010). While sociologists have begun to systematically address NSSI as a topic of research (Adler & Adler, 2007;Chandler, 2016;Steggals, 2015), even coining a distinct 'sociology of self-injury' (Steggals et al, 2020), NSSID and self-injury have yet to be examined at the intersections of medical sociology and critical disability studies. This lack of an explicit disability framework for engaging in self-injury is somewhat surprising, given self-injury's historical relationship to psychiatric illness categories and prevalent psychiatric symptomatology (Chaney, 2017), the chronic, 'hard-to-stop' and emotionally and physically painful nature of self-injury (Chandler, 2016), as well as the stigma associated with the practice, which is frequently characterised as manipulative and attention-seeking (Pembroke, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%