2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in ‘negativity’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
96
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative numbers are thought to be conceptually difficult for both children and adults (De Cruz, 2006). Although no one has addressed the question of whether negative numbers interfere with solving arithmetic problems, there is evidence suggesting that negative terms (e.g., 6 -x = 4) might be more difficult for students to process than positive terms in algebraic equations (Peterson & Aller, 1971;Vlassis, 2004). We hypothesized that arithmetic problems with negative numbers may be processed differently because they usually require subtraction, rather than because of the negative number, per se.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Negative numbers are thought to be conceptually difficult for both children and adults (De Cruz, 2006). Although no one has addressed the question of whether negative numbers interfere with solving arithmetic problems, there is evidence suggesting that negative terms (e.g., 6 -x = 4) might be more difficult for students to process than positive terms in algebraic equations (Peterson & Aller, 1971;Vlassis, 2004). We hypothesized that arithmetic problems with negative numbers may be processed differently because they usually require subtraction, rather than because of the negative number, per se.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this view, we expect a three-way interaction among format, problem size, and operation such that the format effects will be smallest for the ostensibly hardest problems (i.e., recasted large subtraction). Such an interaction is counter-intuitive if negative numbers are considered to be more difficult than positive numbers (e.g., Vlassis, 2004), but existing research on negative numbers in comparison tasks favors a componential view (Ganor-Stern & Tzelgov, 2008;Shaki & Petrusic, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the next level of learning, such as algebra, students can algebraically model correctly but incorrectly in their countdown operations (Seng, 2012). Based on students' difficulties, Vlassis (2004) suggest that the minus sign plays a major role in the development of understanding and using negative numbers.…”
Section: Activity 4: Arithmetic Operation Without Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the initial belief that a proof may be correct, such as Andrew Wiles' proof of Fermat's last theorem, usually does not depend on thorough scrutiny, but on concurrence with high-level ideas long before the details are checked (Thurston, 2006). Mathematics education is organized as a stepwise progression from more elementary to complex notions, as can be witnessed in students who learn to solve equations with negative terms: they build on their already acquired ability to solve equations involving positive terms (Vlassis, 2004). By explaining the individual learning of mathematical concepts in this way, from more elementary to complex, we are faced with the problem of origin of the most elementary mathematical knowledge, which cannot be derived from earlier knowledge.…”
Section: How We Acquire Mathematical Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her study of adolescents' understanding of negative numbers, Vlassis (2004) noticed how 14-year-olds made surprisingly many errors on equations with negative terms. Interviews with these pupils revealed that they primarily relied on procedural rules that they had learned by heart, such as 'if both terms are negative, the sum is negative'.…”
Section: The Case Of Negative Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%