2017
DOI: 10.24989/oega.jb.26.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the bio-economy more inclusive: The role of community forestry and agro-forestry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in the concept of a green economy, social concerns are implemented, political bioeconomy strategies are more focused on economic growth and job creation (Scarlat et al 2015 ; UNEP 2011 ). While bioeconomy is considered to produce many opportunities, there are studies pointing at the gap between bioeconomy and sustainable development goals (SDG) caused mainly by oversimplification of bioeconomy conceptualization (Siegner et al 2017 ). Incautious bioeconomy transformation may cause the rise of conflicts between some SDG, such as conflicting needs for food and bioenergy production, which leads to biodiversity loss, land use change, deforestation, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the concept of a green economy, social concerns are implemented, political bioeconomy strategies are more focused on economic growth and job creation (Scarlat et al 2015 ; UNEP 2011 ). While bioeconomy is considered to produce many opportunities, there are studies pointing at the gap between bioeconomy and sustainable development goals (SDG) caused mainly by oversimplification of bioeconomy conceptualization (Siegner et al 2017 ). Incautious bioeconomy transformation may cause the rise of conflicts between some SDG, such as conflicting needs for food and bioenergy production, which leads to biodiversity loss, land use change, deforestation, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This innovation model can contribute to put environmental protection at the core of knowledge production activities. In addition, it could serve to the imperative of incorporating stakeholders' multiple value perspectives, conditions and needs (e.g., conservation strategies, ecological boundaries, smallholder farmer inclusiveness, provision of livelihood options, and intrinsic value of native plants for local communities in terms of food, feed, and energy self-sufficiency) for responsible and inclusive research and innovation on acrocomia [36,108,143,144,[159][160][161].…”
Section: Fostering Multi-actor Collaboration In the Acrocomia Value Webmentioning
confidence: 99%