‘Making the invisible visible’ through alcohol screening and brief intervention in community pharmacies: an Australian feasibility study

Abstract

BackgroundScreening and brief interventions (SBI) for alcohol related problems have been shown to be effective in health settings such as general practice or emergency departments. Recent data from the United Kingdom and New Zealand suggest that SBI can be delivered through community pharmacies, but this approach has not been tested in Australia. This study assesses the feasibility of delivering alcohol SBI via community pharmacists.MethodWe recruited five pharmacies and developed an SBI training package to be delivered by pharmacy staff, who screened consumers and delivered the brief intervention where appropriate. Consumers also completed a questionnaire on the process. At three months consumers were telephoned to enable ‘retention’ to be quantified. After completing recruitment, a semi-structured interview was conducted with pharmacists on the process of delivering the intervention, potential improvements and sustainability.ResultsFifty consumer participants were screened, ten from each pharmacy. There were 28 (57 %) men and 21 (43 %) women with one not responding. Most (67 %) were aged 25–55 years. Their AUDIT scores had a range of 0 to 39 (mean 10.9, SD 9.8) with 11 categorised as ‘hazardous (8–15)’, four as ‘harmful (16–19)’ and eight as ‘probably dependent (20+)’ consumers of alcohol. Reactions to the process of SBI were generally favourable: for example 75 % agreed that it was either appropriate or very appropriate being asked about their alcohol consumption. With respect to follow-up interviews, 23 (46 %) agreed that they could be contacted, including five from the highest AUDIT category. Subsequently 11 (48 %) were contactable at three months. Three of the five non-low risk drinkers had reduced their level of risk over the three months. Ten pharmacists participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Overall these pharmacists were positive about the intervention and five main themes emerged from the interviews: 1) flexibility applied in recruitment of participants, 2) easiness in use of AUDIT score to facilitate discussions, 3) perceived positive intervention impact, 4) enhanced role of community pharmacists and 5) facilitators and challenges experienced.ConclusionsPharmacy-based SBI appears to be acceptable to consumers and feasible for pharmacy staff to deliver. Challenges remain in translating this potential into actual services.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3805-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Considering pharmacy workflow in the context of Australian community pharmacy: A pilot time and motion study

“…While professional bodies such as the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia provide guidelines for community pharmacists about the delivery of professional services, 6,7 concerns have been raised about pharmacists not fulfilling the roles of the guidelines, and difference in implementation standards between pharmacies. 4,8 Furthermore, pharmacists report time management issues and privacy concerns as significant barriers to implementing new pharmacy services for chronic diseases. 9,10 To tackle such issues, the limited evidence base describing how Australian community pharmacists operate must be expanded.…”

Pharmacy-based alcohol-misuse services: current perspectives

“…A Western Australian feasibility study by Hattingh et al conducted toward the end of 2014 involved five community pharmacies in Perth enrolling and screening 50 consumers in total. 63 Pharmacists already had motivational interviewing skills, 46 and two pharmacists at each pharmacy received face-to-face training in alcohol SBI by an experienced pharmacist who also acted as a mentor throughout the project. From the consumers’ AUDIT scores, 11 were categorized as “hazardous” (score 8–15), 4 as “harmful” (score 16–19), and 8 as “probably dependent” (score 20+) consumers of alcohol.…”

“…Nevertheless, where comprehensive screening is not feasible, some studies have used requests for key medications as a means of increasing the yield from screening and as a way of starting a discussion about lifestyle factors, including alcohol use. 63 …”

Construct validity and differential item functioning of the PHQ-9 among health care workers: Rasch Analysis approach

“…For health care workers, a report of Rasch validation of PHQ-9 is lacking. In addition, one common clinical characteristic among health care workers is alcohol assumption [30,31]. Alcohol users tend to have irrational beliefs [32], as well as other psychiatric symptoms such as anxiety or depression and cognitive impairment [28].…”