ICPSR Data Holdings 2002
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr01255.v1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation

Abstract: We show that social scientists often do not take full advantage of the information available in their statistical results and thus miss opportunities to present quantities that could shed the greatest light on their research questions. In this article we suggest an approach, built on the technique of statistical simulation, to extract the currently overlooked information and present it in a reader-friendly manner. More specifically, we show how to convert the raw results of any statistical procedure into expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
361
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
361
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated results are visually presented in Figure 5. 27 Figure 5 reinforces the regression findings presented in Table 5. Lines presenting the before period (blue dashed lines in Fig.…”
Section: Data and Variablessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated results are visually presented in Figure 5. 27 Figure 5 reinforces the regression findings presented in Table 5. Lines presenting the before period (blue dashed lines in Fig.…”
Section: Data and Variablessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Statistical software packages including Clarify 2.0 and Stata 8.0 are used to estimate the expected values and their uncertainty. 27 For the case of a typical core urban county and the other case of a typical suburban county, expected value algorithm is repeated to approximate 90% confidence interval around mortality rates. We then plot the estimated expected values and the range of uncertainty in Figure 3, which illustrates the regression findings in Table 3 quite sharply.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substantive effects based on simulations (King, Tomz, and Wittenberg, 2000) As expected, population has a positive effect on both CDM projects and PoA. An increase of one standard deviation above the mean increases the number of CDM projects and PoAs by factors of 2.06 and 2.84, respectively.…”
Section: Main Findingssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Uncertainty intervals provide explicit characterisations of the precision around estimates derived from limited information sources. 36,37 Uncertainty ranges for HALE estimates were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation techniques to quantify the uncertainty in life expectancy projections, in GBD 2000 estimates for prevalence and disability severity, and in the survey-based prevalence estimates. 38 …”
Section: Calculation Of Halementioning
confidence: 99%