Making virtual teams more effective: improving relational links

Abstract

PurposeTo report on a study testing training methods to improve communications among virtual team members.Design/methodology/approachTraining methods for improving virtual team communications were developed and administered to 12 virtual teams. Surveys tracking cohesiveness, perceptions of the process and satisfaction with the outcomes were administered before, during and after teams working on a series of projects. These results were compared with similar teams working on the same projects who did not receive training.FindingsResults indicated that teams receiving training showed more cohesiveness, perceptions of the process and satisfaction. These factors have been shown to increase team members' ability to exchange information and to positively affect the group's performance.Practical implicationsRelational link training seems beneficial for virtual teams as the teams in this study that had relational link training showed higher levels of group cohesiveness, satisfaction with their group's outcome, and had a better impression of the group's virtual meeting process. Relational link training may have a benefit of establishing and managing expectations for how groups work together. This is especially true in its mitigating negative impacts on group cohesiveness. It is important to measure the impact of any training program, relational link or otherwise, over multiple periods, as the true impact may not become evident except over longer periods of time.Originality/valueProvides information on improving communication among virtual team members.

How team feedback and team trust influence information processing and learning in virtual teams: A moderated mediation model

“…These perceptions were collected through a check-list proposed by Warkentin and Beranek's (1999) and Beranek and Martz's (2005) studies. Team members' rated several items on a 5-point scale.…”

Virtual R&D Teams: A New Model for Product Development

“…Table 4 summarizes a number of the main advantages of virtual teaming. Clearly, the rise of network technologies has made the use of virtual teams feasible (Beranek & Martz, 2005). Many managers are uncomfortable with the concept of virtual teams because successful management of virtual teams may require new methods of supervision (Jarvenpaa & Leidner, 1999).…”

TONES: a reference framework for identifying skills and competencies and grooming talent to transform middle management through the field of project management

“…For example, a virtual team member may need directions from the project manager and when this access is unavailable based on the time zone differences and work preferences, then inherent delays surface where the productivity from round-the-clock work is compromised (Simon, 2006;Lipnack and Stamps, 1999;Durate and Snyder, 2000;Beranek and Martz, 2005;Furst et al, 1999;Kuruppuarachchi, 2009). Moreover, as the virtual teams resort to the workflow tools as the primary means to communicate, the lack of disciplined organisation in these workflow tools yields counterproductive results due to unclear direction and conflicting requests introducing unnecessary delays wasting organisational capacity due to trust erosion (Coutu, 1998).…”

“…The organiser role centres on the project manager's ability to provide unambiguous direction in task assignment and role assignment in the project environment (Beranek and Martz, 2005;Jedd, 2006). The organiser role involves proper pre-emptive planning, identification of business need and business impact, and setting the expectation with all stakeholders for the project outcomes, and constantly analysing the project progress.…”