Maladaptation and development as usual? Investigating climate change mitigation and adaptation projects in Cambodia

Abstract

Based on research into multiple types of climate change mitigation and adaptation (CCMA) projects and policies in Cambodia, this paper documents intersecting social and environmental conflicts that bear striking resemblance to well-documented issues in the history of development projects. Using data from three case studies, we highlight the ways that industrial development and CCMA initiatives are intertwined in both policy and project creation, and how this confluence is creating potentials for maladaptive outcomes. Each case study involves partnerships between international institutions and the national government, each deploys CCMA as either a primary or supporting legitimation, and each failed to adhere to institutional and/or internationally recognized standards of justice. In Cambodia, mismanaged projects are typically blamed on the kleptocratic and patrimonial governance system. We show how such blame obscures the collusion of international partners, who also sidestep their own safeguards, and ignores the potential for maladaptation at the project level and the adverse social and environmental impacts of the policies themselves. Key policy insights. Initiatives to mitigate or adapt to climate change look very much like the development projects that caused climate change: Extreme caution must be exercised to ensure policies and projects do not exacerbate the conditions driving climate change.. Safeguards 'on paper' are insufficient to avoid negative impacts and strict accountability mechanisms must be put in place.. Academic researchers can be part of that accountability mechanism through case study reports, policy briefs, technical facilitation to help ensure community needs are met and safeguards are executed as written.. Impacts beyond the project scale must be assessed to avoid negative consequences for social and ecological systems at the landscape level.

Assessing the Role of the Perceived Impact of Climate Change on National Adaptation Policy: The Case of Rice Farming in Indonesia

“…Past exposure to climate-related disaster increases the degree of P-I, which in turn drives farmers to undertake adaptation actions [14,15]. While some studies stressed the benefits of autonomous adaptation, other studies reported that it ultimately results in unintended maladaptive outcomes, such as increasing the farmer's vulnerability to CC, shifting the vulnerability to other stakeholders or sectors, and decreasing the quality of common pooled resources [16][17][18][19]. Thus, assessing a farmer's P-I toward CC is essential in two aspects: First, it provides valuable information about the efforts to encourage autonomous adaptation; second, it provides crucial insight into the effort to avoid maladaptation practices.…”

Role of Spatial Analysis in Avoiding Climate Change Maladaptation: A Systematic Review

“…Jones et al [42] "maladaptation happens when short-term strategies increase vulnerability in the long term" [43] Barnett and O'Neill [3,8,44] "action taken ostensibly to avoid or reduce vulnerability to climate change that impacts adversely on, or increases the vulnerability of other systems, sectors or social groups" [7,15,16,26,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Table 1. Cont.…”

Frontiers in Climate Change Adaptation Science: Advancing Guidelines to Design Adaptation Pathways

“…Another adaptation dichotomy includes judging "good" and "bad" adaptation and leads to an almost systematic opposition between adaptation and maladaptation [32]. In essence, maladaptation describes an action that results in undesirable and unintended outcome(s), and eventually increases exposure and vulnerability [10,20,34,35]. However, most of the time, there is a very fine line between success and failure, depending for example on the group of population (adaptation for who?…”