2013
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malaria diagnosis and treatment practices following introduction of rapid diagnostic tests in Kibaha District, Coast Region, Tanzania

Abstract: BackgroundThe success of the universal parasite-based malaria testing policy for fever patients attending primary health care (PHC) facilities in Tanzania will depend highly on health workers’ perceptions and practices. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the present use of malaria diagnostics (rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and microscopy), prescription behaviour and factors affecting adherence to test results at PHC facilities in Kibaha District, Coast Region, Tanzania.MethodsExit interviews were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
71
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, testing rates increased by 34% reaching 58% of tested febrile patients at all facilities and 63% tested at facilities with available diagnostics. The testing levels were higher compared to reports from Zambia [18] and Angola [47], similar to those from several Tanzanian studies [9], [48][50] but lower compared to what can be achieved under more controlled, smaller scale conditions in Uganda [51]. Notably, at facilities providing both diagnostic services we found significantly higher testing rates (76%), preference for malaria microscopy, and in contrast with our previous findings [40], there was no difference in testing rates between facilities providing solely RDTs (55%) or malaria microscopy (58%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…First, testing rates increased by 34% reaching 58% of tested febrile patients at all facilities and 63% tested at facilities with available diagnostics. The testing levels were higher compared to reports from Zambia [18] and Angola [47], similar to those from several Tanzanian studies [9], [48][50] but lower compared to what can be achieved under more controlled, smaller scale conditions in Uganda [51]. Notably, at facilities providing both diagnostic services we found significantly higher testing rates (76%), preference for malaria microscopy, and in contrast with our previous findings [40], there was no difference in testing rates between facilities providing solely RDTs (55%) or malaria microscopy (58%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…19,20 In addition, although since 2010 the recommendation has been that antimalarial medication should only be given when a case is confirmed positive, 21 health workers still experience mistrust in mRDTs and insecurities about managing febrile children with negative mRDT results, thus often resorting to the use of antimalarials even when unnecessary. [22][23][24][25] It has been described that showing the test result to patients can help increase patients' trust and that a lack of communication about the test can lead to a patient misinterpreting its result. 20 Thus, particularly for negative malaria test results and low fever, where according to iCCM no medication should be given, clear communication to caregivers of sick children becomes important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence shows that provider education and training can change practice patterns. 29 One way to promote use and compliance is to provide financial rewards linked to testing. Tying drug subsidies to testing is also worthy of consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%