2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762011000600008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malaria diagnosis from pooled blood samples: comparative analysis of real-time PCR, nested PCR and immunoassay as a platform for the molecular and serological diagnosis of malaria on a large-scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0
17

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
44
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…When RDTs were used as the reference standard, nPCR exhibited sensitivity and positive values of 100% and 39.38% respectively. This ability for PCR to more accurately detect low-grade parasitemia with a higher degree of sensitivity than microscopy and RDTs supports the reports by other researchers [22], [27][28][29][30]. The high false negative obtained using RDTs has been reported and suggested that all RDT negative results be confirmed by microscopic analysis [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…When RDTs were used as the reference standard, nPCR exhibited sensitivity and positive values of 100% and 39.38% respectively. This ability for PCR to more accurately detect low-grade parasitemia with a higher degree of sensitivity than microscopy and RDTs supports the reports by other researchers [22], [27][28][29][30]. The high false negative obtained using RDTs has been reported and suggested that all RDT negative results be confirmed by microscopic analysis [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…One sample was positive for P. malariae by PCR [19]. Recently, samples of 39 donors from the same area were assayed employing a modified real-time PCR protocol [20] using genus-specific primers [17]. ELISA- Pv was reagent in 38% of samples and SD Bioline Pf / Pv was positive in 38% ( Pv band) and 0% ( Pf band).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR techniques are highly sensitive for the detection of parasite nucleic acids [7][8][9], are particularly valuable for species confirmation and should be used in all instances when species cannot be determined by microscopy or to evaluate for mixed infections [5] but unfortunately are not always available everywhere. Immunochromatographic tests most often using a dipstick or a cassette format contain monoclonal antibodies against parasite specific antigens and provide results in 5-20 minutes [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%