2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MALDI-TOF MS identification of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus bedbugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A CCI match value of one represents complete correlation, whereas a CCI match value of zero represents a lack of correlation. 42 The spectra of all specimens, except those used to upgrade the database, were queried against the in-laboratory homemade MS database (Supplemental Figure 1A and B). The level of identification was determined using LSVs given by MALDI-Biotyper v. 3.0 software, corresponding to a matched degree of signal intensities of mass spectra of the query and the reference spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CCI match value of one represents complete correlation, whereas a CCI match value of zero represents a lack of correlation. 42 The spectra of all specimens, except those used to upgrade the database, were queried against the in-laboratory homemade MS database (Supplemental Figure 1A and B). The level of identification was determined using LSVs given by MALDI-Biotyper v. 3.0 software, corresponding to a matched degree of signal intensities of mass spectra of the query and the reference spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of MS spectra is impacted by several parameters such as the storage conditions, the adjustment of the extraction solution volume used for protein extraction, the grinding method, and the selected body part [ 38 ]. In the first step of our study, we tested two kinds of disrupters: both tungsten beads and glass beads have proven to be useful and effective grinding methods in previous MALDI-TOF MS studies [ 38 , 40 , 66 , 67 ]. However, glass beads were reportedly the most commonly used disrupter, as they have been used for various arthropods identification [ 39 , 40 , 66 ], for mycobacteria identification, to disrupt the mycobacterial cell wall [ 68 , 69 ], and for fungal identification, as they were most efficient than steel beads for fungal proteins extraction [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step of our study, we tested two kinds of disrupters: both tungsten beads and glass beads have proven to be useful and effective grinding methods in previous MALDI-TOF MS studies [ 38 , 40 , 66 , 67 ]. However, glass beads were reportedly the most commonly used disrupter, as they have been used for various arthropods identification [ 39 , 40 , 66 ], for mycobacteria identification, to disrupt the mycobacterial cell wall [ 68 , 69 ], and for fungal identification, as they were most efficient than steel beads for fungal proteins extraction [ 70 ]. The glass beads also appeared to be the most suitable for snail sample homogenisation, as they provided reproducible and intense MS spectra for snail species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations