1958
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1958.60.2.02a00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male and Female Adaptations in Culture Change

Abstract: THE PROBLEM HIS paper has a dual purpose : to compare the psychological adaptations T of adult males and females to the exigencies of sociocultural change in an historically primitive but rapidly acculturating population-the Menomini Indians of Wisconsin-and to present the methodology that makes it possible to describe these differences accurately.' In so doing, we hope to help to fill a lacuna in anthropological literature on the differential adjustment of the two sexes in culture change situations, and to il… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it was hypothesized that the transitional and peyote cult groups "alienated as they are from the cultural symbols of their ethnic past and at the same time not having internalized the symbols which constitute the value system of Western society, will exhibit more symptoms of personality disorganization than members of groups closely identified with the symbols of either of these culture types" (p. 80). This empirically defined typology was later replicated by Spindler and Spindler (1958).…”
Section: Spindler and Goldschmidtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it was hypothesized that the transitional and peyote cult groups "alienated as they are from the cultural symbols of their ethnic past and at the same time not having internalized the symbols which constitute the value system of Western society, will exhibit more symptoms of personality disorganization than members of groups closely identified with the symbols of either of these culture types" (p. 80). This empirically defined typology was later replicated by Spindler and Spindler (1958).…”
Section: Spindler and Goldschmidtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociologists George Spindler and Walter Goldschmidt's (1952) Rorschach study of the Menomini native community statistically distinguished clusters of people in a twodimensional space defined by how much they had internalized European values and how much they knew and practiced traditional native ways (Spindler & Spindler, 1958 Those classified as the peyote cult [-F-C] group were people "in transition for whom the stress of this adjustment was especially acute" (p. 75) and as a result had enjoined hallucinogenic practices from another Native culture. Finally, it was hypothesized that the transitional and peyote cult groups "alienated as they are from the cultural symbols of their ethnic past and at the same time not having internalized the symbols which constitute the value system of Western society, will exhibit more symptoms of personality disorganization than members of groups closely identified with the symbols of either of these culture types" (p. 80).…”
Section: Spindler and Goldschmidtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spindler and Spindler (1985) attempted to address these complexities and identified five types of "Indianness" (i.e., peyote cult, native-oriented, transitional, lower-status acculturated, and elite acculturated) all components of the acculturative process. However, the work of Spindler and Spindler (1985) was only based off of one Northern tribe. Suffice to say, this group tends to have more difficulties in coping with their problems   because they lack identity in either culture (Loye and Robert Ryan, 1982 as cited in LaFromboise et al, 1990, Trimble &Mohatt, 1990.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its dynamics can be seen as the selective adaptation of value systems, the process of integration and differentiation, the developmental sequences, and the operation of role determinants and personality factors. (p. 974) This newer definition was offered because the classical definition insinuated that individuals progress from a native state through a transitional stage to an elite acculturated state (Spindler and Spindler, 1967). However, many modern researchers found fault in the original conceptualization because consensus has been building for the contention that acculturation is neither a linear process, nor an achievable end (Trimble, 2003).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%