2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in Etheostoma flavum, neither males nor females show preferences for conspecific fish (Martin & Mendelson, 2013). A sex difference in species discrimination is present in Etheostoma nigripinne but in the opposite direction to our results: females strongly prefer conspecific males while males do not consistently prefer conspecific females (O'Rourke & Mendelson, 2010). While these data sets are not directly comparable due to differences in experimental methodology, this apparent diversity in choosiness and discrimination behaviour hints that darter speciation may be complex, shaped by different selective forces in different clades.…”
Section: Overall Conclusioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in Etheostoma flavum, neither males nor females show preferences for conspecific fish (Martin & Mendelson, 2013). A sex difference in species discrimination is present in Etheostoma nigripinne but in the opposite direction to our results: females strongly prefer conspecific males while males do not consistently prefer conspecific females (O'Rourke & Mendelson, 2010). While these data sets are not directly comparable due to differences in experimental methodology, this apparent diversity in choosiness and discrimination behaviour hints that darter speciation may be complex, shaped by different selective forces in different clades.…”
Section: Overall Conclusioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…parental care; Bonduriansky, 2001). Just as choosy females should be reticent to mate with heterospecific males due to negative fitness consequences, choosy males may similarly be predicted to discriminate against heterospecific females; as a result, the evolution of behavioural isolation may rely on both sexes (Kozak, Reisland, & Boughmann, 2009;O'Rourke & Mendelson, 2010;Svensson, Karlsson, Friberg, & Eroukhmanoff, 2007). Further complicating the picture is maleemale competition, which is increasingly recognized as a selective force underlying male ornament diversification (West-Eberhard, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The extent to which males and females contribute to behavioural isolation varies between taxa [49,50] and findings, such as reported here, that male mate choice plays an important role are not an exception [51][52][53][54][55]. In the house mouse, both males and females may be involved in mate choice [56][57][58].…”
Section: (A) Lower Choosiness Of Femalesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A growing body of evidence suggests that both female and male darters prefer conspecific over heterospecific visual signals (Williams & Mendelson , , ; Ciccotto et al. ; Martin & Mendelson ; O'Rourke & Mendelson ). These preferences may play a significant role in darter divergence and speciation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%