2021
DOI: 10.3390/insects12060533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male-Biased microRNA Discovery in the Pea Aphid

Abstract: Epigenetic mechanisms modulate gene expression levels during development, shaping how a single genome produces a diversity of phenotypes. Here, we begin to explore the epigenetic regulation of sexual dimorphism in pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) by focusing on microRNAs. Previous analyses of microRNAs in aphids have focused solely on females, so we performed deep sequencing of a sample containing early-stage males. We used this sample, plus samples from Genbank, to find 207 novel pea aphid microRNA coding loc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dosage compensation may also differ between tissues (Nozawa et al 2013, Vensko andStone 2015), which would explain why the Drosophila X is enriched in male-biased genes expressed in the brain, but shows no excess or even a deficit of male-biased genes for all other tissues (Huylmans et al 2015). Given the scarce knowledge of dosage compensation and MSCI in aphids (the only four studies that analyzed gene expression in aphid males were performed on whole individuals, Jaquiéry et al 2013, Mathers et al 2019, Liu et al 2021, Ziabari et al 2022, we were not able to account for these factors in our theoretical predictions. Thus, we focused primarily on testing predictions assuming sexual antagonism, but explored the presence of dosage compensation (and MSCI to a lesser extent) on the tissue-specific transcriptomes collected for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dosage compensation may also differ between tissues (Nozawa et al 2013, Vensko andStone 2015), which would explain why the Drosophila X is enriched in male-biased genes expressed in the brain, but shows no excess or even a deficit of male-biased genes for all other tissues (Huylmans et al 2015). Given the scarce knowledge of dosage compensation and MSCI in aphids (the only four studies that analyzed gene expression in aphid males were performed on whole individuals, Jaquiéry et al 2013, Mathers et al 2019, Liu et al 2021, Ziabari et al 2022, we were not able to account for these factors in our theoretical predictions. Thus, we focused primarily on testing predictions assuming sexual antagonism, but explored the presence of dosage compensation (and MSCI to a lesser extent) on the tissue-specific transcriptomes collected for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dosage compensation may also differ between tissues (Nozawa et al 2013, Vensko and Stone 2015), which would explain why the Drosophila X is enriched in male-biased genes expressed in the brain, but shows no excess or even a deficit of male-biased genes for all other tissues (Huylmans et al 2015). Given the scarce knowledge of dosage compensation and MSCI in aphids (the only four studies that analyzed gene expression in aphid males were performed on whole individuals, Jaquiéry et al 2013, Mathers et al 2019, Liu et al 2021, Ziabari et al 2022), we were not able to account for these factors in our theoretical predictions. Thus, we focused primarily on testing predictions assuming sexual antagonism, but explored the presence of dosage compensation (and MSCI to a lesser extent) on the tissue-specific transcriptomes collected for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the scarce knowledge of dosage compensation and MSCI in aphids (the only four studies that analyzed gene expression in aphid males were performed on whole individuals, Jaquiéry et al 2013, Mathers et al 2019, Liu et al 2021, Ziabari et al 2022, we were not able to account for these factors in our theoretical predictions. Thus, we focused primarily on testing predictions assuming sexual antagonism, but explored the presence of dosage compensation (and MSCI to a lesser extent) on the tissue-specific transcriptomes collected for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%