2011
DOI: 10.1651/09-3234.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male Dimorphism in a New Interstitial Species of the Genus Microloxoconcha (Podocopida: Ostracoda)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is almost identical to the interspecies genetic distances of other podocopid ostracods (Yamaguchi 2000, Higashi et al 2011) or somewhat larger (Martens et al 2005, Brandăo et al 2010, Karanovic 2015). The distance revealed by the nucleotide and amino acid sequences demonstrated that the distance between Paracobanocythere vietnamensis sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This value is almost identical to the interspecies genetic distances of other podocopid ostracods (Yamaguchi 2000, Higashi et al 2011) or somewhat larger (Martens et al 2005, Brandăo et al 2010, Karanovic 2015). The distance revealed by the nucleotide and amino acid sequences demonstrated that the distance between Paracobanocythere vietnamensis sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Higashi et al . [ 42 ] studied several populations of Microloxoconcha dimorpha Higashi et al ., 2011, an interstitial ostracod with high morphological variability. Phylogenetic trees constructed based on COI sequences did not support the presence of separate species for the different morphological forms, while the genetic distance ranged from 0.2 to 0.8% between geographically close populations and slightly more than 6% between allopatric populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported that 95% could be used for species-level barcoding [17,[22][23]. The use of 3% to 5% genetic divergences must be added by other data [31], including geographic localities [32]. This study utilized the geographic localities of the samples and reference species as additional considerations for species determination.…”
Section: Taxonomic Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining both molecular and conventional identification for WJM5, we finally decided that WJM5 was referred to as L. decussatus. The argument was that samples of single species collected from different localities could have a relatively low genetic identity and high genetic distance to their conspecific references in barcode libraries [6,17,[21][22][23][31][32].…”
Section: Molecular Barcoding Versus Morphological Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%