1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01066159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male mating speed as a component of fitness inDrosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering mating ability, the majority of significant differences were associated with males (table 3) in accord with the Chateau Tahbilk data (see Introduction) and the general conclusion that male mating speed is a most important fitness component in Drosophi!a (Parsons, 1974). Further, in accord with the Chateau Tahbilk data, each significant departure from random mating involved heterozygote excess which was especially evident at 29°C, suggesting an extreme environment effect.…”
Section: Fitness and Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering mating ability, the majority of significant differences were associated with males (table 3) in accord with the Chateau Tahbilk data (see Introduction) and the general conclusion that male mating speed is a most important fitness component in Drosophi!a (Parsons, 1974). Further, in accord with the Chateau Tahbilk data, each significant departure from random mating involved heterozygote excess which was especially evident at 29°C, suggesting an extreme environment effect.…”
Section: Fitness and Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This also suggests that there is more additive genetic variance for survival and development time compared with mating ability, with mating ability being apparently subject to intense directional selection irrespective of habitat (Parsons, 1974 (Hoffmann et al, 1984).…”
Section: Domesticationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…When, for each locus, the fitness of the 2 homozygotes is estimated relative to the heterozygote (pooling homozygotes of similar mobility and heterozygotes with heterozygotes), evidence for overdominance arises for Idh-2 (WI\,, = 0.62, W,, = 0.64) and 6-Pgd (W,4A -0.69, W,, = 0.56) and the heterozygote is slightly inferior for Idh-l (W,, = 1.17, W,, = 1.10). Overdominant selection for Idh-2 and 6-Pgd does not necessailly mean that selection is favouring heterozygotes for these loci as selection may be favouring heterozygotes at closely linked The experlmental design allows us to ask whether heterozygous males are at a n advantage for matingspeed, a n important component of fitness (Parsons 1974, Hedrick & Murray 1983. Differences in heterozygosity between early and late mating males were tested by the G-test with Williams' correction.…”
Section: Heterozygosity At Single Loci and Sexual Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parsons, 1974). Under certain experimental conditions it appears to be the major factor influencing gene frequency changes (Prout, 1971;Bundgaard & Christiansen, 1972).…”
Section: Grh 40mentioning
confidence: 99%