1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00018-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male reproductive tactics and reproductive success of the group-living feral cat (Felis catus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we showed that there is a correlation between the likelihood of being infected and three different measures of social ranking (see also Yamaguchi et al 1996). First, infected individuals are larger than other individuals, and it has been shown that body size is a major factor in determining the social rank of cats (Liberg 1981(Liberg , 1983Yamane et al 1996;Yamane 1998). Second, analysis of the spatial structure of the population indicates that infected individuals had the largest home ranges, which is a typical feature of dominant individuals in domestic cats (Liberg 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Indeed, we showed that there is a correlation between the likelihood of being infected and three different measures of social ranking (see also Yamaguchi et al 1996). First, infected individuals are larger than other individuals, and it has been shown that body size is a major factor in determining the social rank of cats (Liberg 1981(Liberg , 1983Yamane et al 1996;Yamane 1998). Second, analysis of the spatial structure of the population indicates that infected individuals had the largest home ranges, which is a typical feature of dominant individuals in domestic cats (Liberg 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, a review of the non-suidae mammalian literature suggests that our results should not be generalized to other environments. Say et al (2002) found that the mating system of feral cats (Felis catus) in a sub-Artic environment could be confined to monogamy, contrary to what was observed in environments under strong human influence where the mating system is polygynous or promiscuous (Yamane 1998;Say et al 1999). The mating system can change according to environmental conditions and with population density, and thus can change the number (percentage) of offspring in a litter sired for different males.…”
Section: Paternity Analysis and Mating Systemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since in the domestic cat there is no cooperation between males, success in siring offspring should, according to the "dominance" model, depend upon rivalry between males, and the mating choices of females. However, while male cats compete routinely over other resources (Bonanni et al, 2007), they rarely fight in the vicinity of receptive females, and dominance as measured by agonistic interactions between males often does not predict their reproductive success (Natoli and De Vito, 1991;Say and Pontier 2004;Yamane, 1998), an exception being the Fori di Traiano colony studied by Natoli et al (2007). (Note that Liberg et al, 2000, use "dominant" simply to mean "breeder").…”
Section: Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%