2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male sexual attractiveness and parental effort in blue tits: a test of the differential allocation hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we recorded the time at which a bird entered or left the nest. From these recordings, following a procedure similar to that of Johnsen et al (2005), we extracted feeding rates. We found a strong correlation between parental feeding rates estimated with videotape recording and those obtained by means of this system (García-Navas et al 2009).…”
Section: Monitoring Parental Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, we recorded the time at which a bird entered or left the nest. From these recordings, following a procedure similar to that of Johnsen et al (2005), we extracted feeding rates. We found a strong correlation between parental feeding rates estimated with videotape recording and those obtained by means of this system (García-Navas et al 2009).…”
Section: Monitoring Parental Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since males did not provision nestlings less when paired to females whose plumage brightness had been reduced and females fed nestlings at a similar rate regardless of their plumage brightness treatment, it is difficult to reconcile why nestlings reared in the treatment where female plumage brightness was reduced and brood size was enlarged grew shorter ninth primary flight feathers and were less likely to fledge ( unlikely that the plumage treatment directly affected female behaviour since the application of these markers and silicone paste have been used previously with no reported adverse effects on behaviour or feather quality (Ballentine and Hill, 2003;Johnsen et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2007), it is possible that the altered plumage brightness influenced social interactions among females, and the feedback females received from these interactions influenced their behaviour or physiology (reviewed in Vitousek et al, 2014b). This social mechanism has been proposed to explain the increased and decreased levels of androgens in male and female barn swallows (Hirundo rustica erythrogaster), respectively, the week following an experimental darkening of their ventral plumage (Safran et al, 2008;Vitousek et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, I evenly applied to the dorsal feathers a non-toxic permanent blue marker to enhance or silicon paste to reduce the plumage brightness of females; control females were treated in the same manner, but the marker used contained water. The markers and silicone paste I used in my study have been used previously in other studies to manipulate plumage colour (e.g., Safran et al, 2005;Johnsen et al, 2005), and I was confident that my treatment produced the desired effect throughout the experimental period because the effects of these markers and paste have been detected for on average 15 days after their application (Johnsen et al, 2005). After the plumage brightness treatment, the brightness of female plumage fell within the natural range for female tree swallows at my study area (Berzins and Dawson, 2016).…”
Section: Study Area and General Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations