2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Males choose to keep their heads: Preference for lower risk females in a praying mantid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is known that males can discriminate between well-fed and hungry females (Barry et al 2010; Brown et al 2012). Thus, feeding females could be more attractive not because prey-handling makes them less able to attack but because feeding provides a cue to males that females are becoming satiated and therefore less dangerous (Avigliano et al 2016). Our experimental design accounted for this possibility by providing females with equivalent access to large numbers of prey immediately before or during trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known that males can discriminate between well-fed and hungry females (Barry et al 2010; Brown et al 2012). Thus, feeding females could be more attractive not because prey-handling makes them less able to attack but because feeding provides a cue to males that females are becoming satiated and therefore less dangerous (Avigliano et al 2016). Our experimental design accounted for this possibility by providing females with equivalent access to large numbers of prey immediately before or during trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary sexual characteristics, such as color, ornaments, dances, songs, and pheromones, often appear in either sex to attract the other and are divergent among species, demonstrating that different animals choose mates based on different criteria. Generally, males are more exaggerated and less choosy than females, and research tends to focus on mate choice by females (female choice); however, there is increasing evidence for male choice ( Avigliano et al, 2016 ; Bloch et al, 2016 ; Utagawa et al, 2016 ) showing the importance of sexual traits in females to trigger the courtship behavior of males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, sexual cannibalism clearly represents, to varying degrees, a mating opportunity cost for males, and diverse traits are thought to have evolved in response to the risk of sexual cannibalism ( Elgar 1992 ). These include sexual dimorphism ( Elgar et al 1990 ; Elgar 1991 ; Fernández-Montraveta et al 2014 ; Anderson and Hebets 2016 ); post copulation thanatosis ( Bilde et al 2006 ); the capacity to distinguish between females according to risk ( Gaskett et al 2004 ; Moskalik and Uetz 2011 ; Xiao et al 2015 ; Avigliano et al 2016 ); laying silk over the female ( Anderson and Hebets 2016 ; Zhang et al 2011 ; but see Trillo et al 2019 ); approaching the female only when she is feeding on a prey item ( Fromhage and Schneider 2005 ); sacrificing legs ( Neumann and Schneider 2020 ); and by copulating with moulting females ( Uhl et al 2015 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%