2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignancy risk and false-negative rate of fine needle aspiration cytology in thyroid nodules ≥4.0 cm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, malignancy rate was found to be 25.6% for nodules < 1 cm, 10.2% for nodules 1-3.9 cm and 8.5% for nodules ≥ 4.0 cm, showing that the risk of malignancy decreases with increasing nodule size. We have discussed these results in our previous study (29). In summary, we have indicated that this finding might be related to the selection criteria of our study, which included an operative cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In the present study, malignancy rate was found to be 25.6% for nodules < 1 cm, 10.2% for nodules 1-3.9 cm and 8.5% for nodules ≥ 4.0 cm, showing that the risk of malignancy decreases with increasing nodule size. We have discussed these results in our previous study (29). In summary, we have indicated that this finding might be related to the selection criteria of our study, which included an operative cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between malignant and benign nodules size. These contradictory results show that the size of the nodule is not reliable at predicting malignancy and should not be applied for medical decision making (12,13,(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between malignant and benign nodules size. These contradictory results show that the size of the nodule is not reliable at predicting malignancy and should not be applied for medical decision making (12, 13, 22-24). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, McCoy et al shown a high rate of (16%) false-negative FNABs in ≥4cm nodules and suggested that FNAB is not a reliable procedure on these patients and diagnostic lobectomy is required too (9). Bestepe et al reported the rate of false-negative FNAB in nodules ≥4.0 cm was twice as high as in nodules 1.0–3.9 cm (24). In addition, in different studies false-negative rate of FNAB has been reported between 4 and 21% (25-28); and false-positive rate of FNAB has been reported between 0 and 28% (27-29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%