Malignancy risk of thyroid nodules: quality assessment of the thyroid ultrasound report

Abstract

Background Thyroid nodules are a challenge in clinical practice and thyroid ultrasonography is essential for assessing the risk of malignancy. The use of ultrasound-based malignancy risk classification systems has been recommended by several scientific societies but radiologist’s adherence to these guidelines may vary. The authors aimed to analyze the quality of the information provided by the thyroid ultrasound report, to assess the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules, in Portugal. Methods Multicenter and retrospective study, conducted in three of the five Portuguese NUTS2 corresponding to about 88.3% of the mainland population. We included 344 consecutive unselected participants aged ≥ 18 years who underwent thyroid ultrasonography in 2019. The description of six features of the dominant thyroid nodule was analyzed: maximum size, shape, margins, composition, echogenicity and echogenic foci. A utility score, including these six features, was used as an indicator of the report’s quality. A score of 4 was considered as a minimum value. Results Maximum diameter was reported for all nodules. Shape, margins, composition, echogenicity and echogenic foci were reported in 8.1%, 25.0%, 76.5%, 53.2% and 20.9%, respectively. Only 21.8% of the nodules had a score ≥ 4. At least one of four suspicious features, including marked hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, irregular margins and non-oval shape, was identified in 8.7% of the nodules. Cervical lymph nodes’ status was reported in 93% of the exams. The risk category was only reported in 7.8% of the participants. Conclusion The adherence of Portuguese radiologists to a standardized reporting model and to an ultrasound-based malignancy risk stratification system is still low and has implications for the correct characterization of the malignancy risk of nodules and the decision to perform fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

Epidemiological exploration of the impact of bluetooth headset usage on thyroid nodules using Shapley additive explanations method

“…In China, a national epidemiological survey conducted in 2021 revealed a total prevalence of 36.9% 6 . Although thyroid nodules are predominantly benign, the potential risk of malignancy makes the increasing prevalence a concerning global health issue 7 , 8 . The increasing prevalence of thyroid nodules poses a significant challenge to healthcare professionals and policymakers worldwide.…”

Accuracy of fine‐needle aspiration cytopathology to differentiate malignant and benign thyroid nodules with ≥4 cm diameter: A retrospective study

“…Palpation detects only a small number of TNs (3%–7%), While this rate is much higher in ultrasonographic examination with high‐resolution devices (up to 76%), 2 making it the first choice for nodule detection and investigation for potential malignancy 3 . Malignancy risk of TN has been reported to be 3.1% and 4.7% in patients with multinodular goiter and solitary TNs, respectively 4 . Both thyroid ultrasonography and ultrasonographic‐guided fine‐needle aspiration are used to differentiate malignant from benign TN 5 .…”

“…3 Malignancy risk of TN has been reported to be 3.1% and 4.7% in patients with multinodular goiter and solitary TNs, respectively. 4 Both thyroid ultrasonography and ultrasonographic-guided fine-needle aspiration are used to differentiate malignant from benign TN. 5 About 5%-10% of cases with TN are finally diagnosed with thyroid malignancy, 6 which is the most commonly categorized as well-differentiated thyroid cancer in the subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), its most prevalent subgroup.…”