“…Although, as Nonomura et al [7] reported, 24 of 39 (62%) hepatic AMLs with an invasive growth pattern into the surrounding parenchyma and along the portal and hepatic veins showed no malignant behavior, there were more than 9 cases of AML which may have had malignant potential [3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Our further review of these nine cases revealed that although an invasive pattern was found in almost all cases, 3 of 4 cases (Cases 2, 6-8) [9,[13][14][15] which showed portal vein thrombosis had a significantly severe prognosis, with 75% mortality, caused by multiple recurrences and metastases in the liver (Cases 2, 7, 8), peritoneum (Cases 2, 7), retroperitoneal region (Case 7), gastrohepatic omentum (Case 7), pancreas (Case 8), and lung (Case 8) [9,14,15]. Case 2, which Dalle et al [9] reported, was followed up for 5 years, because it was diagnosed as AML by immunohistochemical analysis; however, its size increased from 15 to 26 cm in 5 years, and as a result, there were multiple metastases in the liver, which revealed portal vein thromboses.…”