“…Regarding pathologic findings, the reported cases (in order of frequency) included malignant melanocytic proliferations mimicking a cellular blue nevus but lacking an identifiable benign component (in 38% of cases) 5,11,[13][14][15]18,20,25,28,30,33,36,47,49 or melanomas arising in association with a distinctive blue nevus component, including (a) cellular blue nevus (26%), 4,5,11,16,18,29,40,46,50,51,53 (b) common blue nevus (21%), 5,13,22,24,27,31,32,34,37,39,41,43,52 (c) both cellular and common blue nevus (13%), 12,16,21,23,35,38,44,45,48 (d) neurocristic hamartoma (1%) 42 and (e) nevus of Ota (1%). 17 In contrast, all of the cases in our series consisted of distinctly biphenotypic melanocytic proliferations (melanoma together with a benign blue nevus component).…”