2021
DOI: 10.1111/jop.13246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant development of proliferative verrucous/multifocal leukoplakia: A critical systematic review, meta‐analysis and proposal of diagnostic criteria

Abstract: Oral leukoplakia (OL) is the most common and emblematic oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD), and it was defined by the WHO Collaborating Centre as "a predominantly white plaque of questionable risk having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no increased risk for cancer". [1][2][3] In 1985, Hansen et al. 4 described a new clinical entity called "proliferative verrucous leukoplakia" (PVL), which was characterised by the development of multiple and proliferative oral leukoplakias,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, PVL presents as a white plaque that tends to become multifocal with an aggressive, progressive and irreversible behaviour [7,11,12]. The rate of malignant transformation of PVL into OSCC or oral verrucous carcinoma varies from 14.3% to 75%, with an average rate ranging from 43.87% to 65.8% [13,14]. Unlike OL and OSCC, the aetiology of PVL is not always associated with the risk factors, such as tobacco, alcohol and areca [7,8,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, PVL presents as a white plaque that tends to become multifocal with an aggressive, progressive and irreversible behaviour [7,11,12]. The rate of malignant transformation of PVL into OSCC or oral verrucous carcinoma varies from 14.3% to 75%, with an average rate ranging from 43.87% to 65.8% [13,14]. Unlike OL and OSCC, the aetiology of PVL is not always associated with the risk factors, such as tobacco, alcohol and areca [7,8,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Indeed, some multifocal cases of OE reviewed on this study, 22 multiple OPMD, such as OL, OLD, and proliferative multifocal/verrucous leukoplakia. [44][45][46] Unfortunately, we had several limitations during the performance of this systematic review and meta-analysis. First, is the low number of observational studies on the MD of OE, and with good clinical follow-up period of patients; and second, is the lack of standardization and changes in the diagnostic criteria for OE over the years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our review, almost half of the OE lesions had ED in the first biopsy, and presence of ED was six times higher than absence of ED (41.2% vs. 7.19%) (Table 4). Moreover, ED remains the most important prognostic factor in relation to the MD of multiple OPMD, such as OL, OLD, and proliferative multifocal/verrucous leukoplakia 44–46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main risk factors of malignant transformation of OPMD described to date are patient-related, clinical (e.g., female, >50 years; non-smoker with a nonhomogeneous red lesion of the tongue and floor of mouth >200 mm 2 and existing for several years; history of previous OSCC; diabetes mellitus), tumor-related, histological (i.e., severe dysplasia), and molecular factors (i.e., aneuploidy, loss of heterozygosity [LOH]). The reported malignant transformation rates range from 3 to 66%, indicating that variable definitions may be used, data with different follow-up periods have been collected and the existence of histological and, in particular, molecular heterogeneity of OPMD [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. For OPMDs that are visible, standard policy is to take multiple, repeated, and deep incision biopsies to check for invasive growth and dysplasia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%