2001
DOI: 10.1081/cnv-100000071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma: An Institutional Reviews

Abstract: Tumor grade, size, and distant metastases at initial presentation remain the most important prognostic factors for MFH. Resection with negative microscopic margins decreased the incidence of local recurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…16,19,20 Tumor grade, size, depth, histologic subtype, and distant metastases at initial presentation seem to be the important prognostic factors for MFH. 2,19 The tumor has a local recurrence rate of 19%-31% and a metastatic rate of 31%-35%. The common metastatic sites are the lung (90%), bone (8%), and liver (1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,19,20 Tumor grade, size, depth, histologic subtype, and distant metastases at initial presentation seem to be the important prognostic factors for MFH. 2,19 The tumor has a local recurrence rate of 19%-31% and a metastatic rate of 31%-35%. The common metastatic sites are the lung (90%), bone (8%), and liver (1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37] Both local recurrence and distant metastases often develop within 12-24 months of diagnosis. Only a minority of patients develop metastases after 5 years, with the common metastatic sites being lung (90%), bone (8%), and liver (1%).…”
Section: Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopically, MFHs are recognised as pleomorphic tumours composed of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and histiocytes (Enzinger and Weiss, 1995); however, the cellular origin is still unclear. So far, the parameters size, localisation, necrosis, intravascular invasion, and histopathological characteristics of the tumour have been demonstrated to have prognostic value (Gustafson, 1994;Scully et al, 1994;Singer et al, 1994;Tanabe et al, 1994;Coindre et al, 1996;Le Doussal et al, 1996;Fletcher et al, 2001;Gibbs et al, 2001). However, these parameters are not specific and sensitive enough to allow the identification of a patient group at high risk of developing metastases and local recurrences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%