2021
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab191.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant Gastrointestinal Neuroectodermal Tumor: a case report and a review of the literature

Abstract: Introduction/Objective Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor (GNET) is a rare soft tissue tumor arising in the wall of the gastrointestinal tract. The GNET was first described as an osteoclast rich tumor of the gastrointestinal tract with features resembling clear cell sarcoma, with only few cases reported in the literature. Methods/Case Report We report a case of a 71-year-old man with a past medical history of hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This patient was diagnosed and treated for Ewing sarcoma with complete remission 24 years prior to the appearance of GNET [ 9 ]. Another report of GNET described a case positive for CD56, CD99, FLI1, and synaptophysin, and negative for chromogranin, TTF-1, SMA, desmin, CD34, EMA, pan-cytokeratin, and lymphoid markers; there were no reportable IHC results for S100 or SOX-10 and no reportable EWSR1 rearrangement precluding a final diagnosis of GNET [ 54 ]. Based on pathology assessment of the two EWSR1-FLI1 positive cases in our cohort, one did not have any reported IHC information, and the other was positive for S100 (as well as CD99 and vimentin but these are nonspecific markers and can be seen in GNET) but negative for SOX-10.…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This patient was diagnosed and treated for Ewing sarcoma with complete remission 24 years prior to the appearance of GNET [ 9 ]. Another report of GNET described a case positive for CD56, CD99, FLI1, and synaptophysin, and negative for chromogranin, TTF-1, SMA, desmin, CD34, EMA, pan-cytokeratin, and lymphoid markers; there were no reportable IHC results for S100 or SOX-10 and no reportable EWSR1 rearrangement precluding a final diagnosis of GNET [ 54 ]. Based on pathology assessment of the two EWSR1-FLI1 positive cases in our cohort, one did not have any reported IHC information, and the other was positive for S100 (as well as CD99 and vimentin but these are nonspecific markers and can be seen in GNET) but negative for SOX-10.…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, the clinical diagnosis is mainly based on imaging, endoscopic, and pathological examinations to observe the shape, color, and mobility of the lesions. However, the diagnosis is difficult, because the lesions are located in the submucosal mucosa [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%