2002
DOI: 10.1007/s005950200097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant Melanoma of the Anorectum: Report of Four Cases

Abstract: Four cases of anorectal malignant melanoma are reported in this paper. All patients underwent an abdominoperineal resection with lymph node dissection for a curative operation and received postoperative chemotherapy with dacarbazine, ranimustine, and vincristine, either with or without interferon-beta. One of these patients has been observed for more than 6 years postoperatively without any evidence of recurrence. The other three patients had advanced diseases at the time of diagnosis, and died within 3 years … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the main arguments against APR are its associated morbidity and mortality, and a high incidence of inguinal lymph node metastasis (not resected with this approach). Additionally, there is no evidence of a survival benefit of APR compared with WLE, based on disease-free survival curves [3,14,15]. As a result, it is recommended that local therapy for the primary tumor should be a sphincter-sparing local excision with normal margins when technically feasible [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the main arguments against APR are its associated morbidity and mortality, and a high incidence of inguinal lymph node metastasis (not resected with this approach). Additionally, there is no evidence of a survival benefit of APR compared with WLE, based on disease-free survival curves [3,14,15]. As a result, it is recommended that local therapy for the primary tumor should be a sphincter-sparing local excision with normal margins when technically feasible [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is no evidence of a survival benefit of APR compared with WLE, based on disease-free survival curves [3,14,15]. As a result, it is recommended that local therapy for the primary tumor should be a sphincter-sparing local excision with normal margins when technically feasible [14,15]. Hence, APR should be reserved for lesions that cannot be removed by local excision (local bulky disease), or for salvage surgery in selected cases of isolated local recurrence [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the lesion is thick (>3 mm) and large (>30 mm), curative surgery cannot be achieved [29]. In this case, conservative local excision and adjuvant therapy can result in a better prognosis [6].…”
Section: Surgical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%