1998
DOI: 10.1159/000029240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant Pleural Effusion: Prognostic Factors for Survival and Response to Chemical Pleurodesis in a Series of 120 Cases

Abstract: Chemical pleurodesis is an effective treatment of malignant pleural effusions, but indications must be individualised to optimise its results. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship of various prognostic features with both the response rate to pleurodesis and the probability of patient survival. A non-concurrent cohort study was carried out in which 120 evaluable patients with malignant pleural effusion underwent pleurodesis. Lung (40%), breast (26.6%), and unknown primary site (12.5%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
87
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
87
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Pleurodesis causes elimination of pleural space and theoretically leading to permanent cessation of fluid collection as a result of the formation of fibrous adhesion between the lung and parietal pleura [6]. The efficacy of chemical pleurodesis rests mainly on the performance of an adequate technique allowing complete drainage of the pleural fluid, a total re-expansion of the underlying lung, and consistent adhesion of both pleural surfaces as defined by Martinez et al [7] The methods of pleurodesis include intrapleural instillation of a sclerosing agent using a chest tube or videothoracoscopy or surgical abrasion using dry gauze [8]. Both methods were shown to be of equal effectiveness [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pleurodesis causes elimination of pleural space and theoretically leading to permanent cessation of fluid collection as a result of the formation of fibrous adhesion between the lung and parietal pleura [6]. The efficacy of chemical pleurodesis rests mainly on the performance of an adequate technique allowing complete drainage of the pleural fluid, a total re-expansion of the underlying lung, and consistent adhesion of both pleural surfaces as defined by Martinez et al [7] The methods of pleurodesis include intrapleural instillation of a sclerosing agent using a chest tube or videothoracoscopy or surgical abrasion using dry gauze [8]. Both methods were shown to be of equal effectiveness [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Among patients with malignant effusions, the mean survival time is 3-13 months. (3,4) Although many patients respond to adjuvant treatments, which can control the primary disease, the great majority improve only after palliative therapy designed to avoid recurrence of the effusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognosis in this case is very poor, with reported 1-and 6-month mortality rates of 54% and 85%, respectively [32,33], and a mean survival time after effusion of Ͻ6 months [34,35], ranging from 2.5 months for patients with lung carcinoma to 7 months for patients with breast carcinoma [36]. The main symptoms at diagnosis are dyspnea, pain, and cough, and they might be present even with only a small amount of pleural fluid (Ͻ500 ml), dramatically affecting exercise ability and quality of life [37].…”
Section: Malignant Pleural Effusionmentioning
confidence: 95%