Despite significant advancement in imaging and treatment modalities for metastatic brain cancers, and particularly primary brain cancers, clinical outcomes remain poor. 1,2 Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive neurosurgical technique that is becoming increasingly popular, especially in the treatment of deep-seated and difficult-to-access lesions. 3 LITT is generally well-tolerated and has been demonstrated to be just as, if not more, effective than other treatment methods, such as surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation. LITT may also have a role with adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma because it transiently disrupts the blood brain barrier, allowing for greater chemotherapy penetration. 4 The authors of "Risk of Tract Seeding Following Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Patients with Intracranial Tumors" performed a retrospective study of tumor seeding in patients who received LITT for either primary or metastatic brain tumors. The authors found that while tract seeding was rare in patients receiving LITT therapy, it was associated with a shorter time to disease progression. All patients with tract seeding received ablations that proceeded from superficial to deep, while a majority of patients without tract seeding received ablations in the opposite direction, from deep to superficial. It is also unclear whether the tract seeding was a result of LITT itself or the biopsy that was performed simultaneously. 5 These results are valuable for clinical consideration in future LITT cases, as well as inspiring further studies. However, a minor limitation results from the limited sample size restricting opportunity for multivariate data analysis evaluating the independent association of factors, including tumor type, location, and tract distance, with seeding. Limited sample size may have also limited evaluation of survival and seeding associations in subgroup analysis of metastatic tumors, where the difference in overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis was insignificant but trended toward greater survival among patients without tract seeding. Regardless, the data from this study provide strong support for larger studies evaluating tract seeding or the inclusion of this outcome in subsequent LITT studies, particularly larger,