1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43651-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant Vesical Tumors Following Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract: We present 11 male patients with spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder disease in whom malignant vesical tumors developed. The incidence of these tumors in our spinal cord injury unit was 2.3 per cent. We investigated retrospectively the clinical, endoscopic and radiographic diagnoses, and analyzed the treatment. The most common presenting symptoms were recurrent urinary infections, hematuria and stone disease. Two patients presented with abdominal symptomatology (a large abdominopelvic mass and peritoniti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
55
0
8

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
55
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Most earlier studies have shown that the relative risk of a bladder neoplasm in the spinal cord injured population is 16-28 times higher than that of the general population. [1][2][3] Recently, this increase has come into some question with a study showing no increase in cancer rates among a spinal cord injured population. 4 The patient population in this study did not undergo formal screening and had a much lower rate of tobacco use than in other studied populations, but it does suggest that further, wellcontrolled studies need to be performed to determine the true incidence of bladder neoplasms in spinal cord injured populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most earlier studies have shown that the relative risk of a bladder neoplasm in the spinal cord injured population is 16-28 times higher than that of the general population. [1][2][3] Recently, this increase has come into some question with a study showing no increase in cancer rates among a spinal cord injured population. 4 The patient population in this study did not undergo formal screening and had a much lower rate of tobacco use than in other studied populations, but it does suggest that further, wellcontrolled studies need to be performed to determine the true incidence of bladder neoplasms in spinal cord injured populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these findings have been noted in earlier studies. 3,11,[13][14][15][16] The reason for the rapid and aggressive nature of these tumors is unknown. In other populations with bladder cancer, approximately 25% will present with muscle invasive disease, 6 whereas in this study over 1/2 had advanced disease at presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 A recent study by Stonehill advocates the use of cytology for screening SCI patients, 14 whereas other reports have shown that it is not adequately speci®c due to concurrent in¯ammation from infection and catheterization. 2,15 In recent years, several assays have been introduced as screening mechanisms for recurrent bladder cancer, though none have been indicated for populations at risk without a prior bladder cancer diagnosis. The bladder tumor antigen test (BTA-Stat, Bard Diagnostic Sciences, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA) assays urine for a urothelial basement membrane protein that is released when bladder tumors are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its incidence in the spinal cord injury population has been reported to be 2.3%.2 These tumours are 460 times more common than bladder tumours in the general population. 2 The increased occurrence of bladder tumours correlates with the duration of urothelial inflammation, chronic urinary tract infection, vesical stone, and indwelling catheter drainage of the urinary bladder. It may be desirable to monitor those patients who are at high risk for developing bladder tumours by annual check-ups in clusive of cystoscopy with cold-cup biopsies of all suspicious areas as well as predetermined random sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%