2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions

Abstract: Mental accounts are often characterized as self‐control devices that consumers employ to prevent excess spending and consumption. However, under certain conditions of ambiguity, the mental accounting process is malleable; that is, consumers have flexibility in assigning expenses to different mental accounts. We demonstrate how consumers flexibly classify expenses, or construct accounts, to justify spending. An expense that can be assigned to more than one account (i.e., an ambiguous expense) is more likely to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
188
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
188
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experiment, participants had to imagine that, following mental budgeting principles, they had spread their monthly income among different categories (clothing, food, entertainment, and a category for further expenses) and had allotted $75 to the category "clothing" for the following month. Cheema and Soman (2006) successfully applied a similar approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the experiment, participants had to imagine that, following mental budgeting principles, they had spread their monthly income among different categories (clothing, food, entertainment, and a category for further expenses) and had allotted $75 to the category "clothing" for the following month. Cheema and Soman (2006) successfully applied a similar approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies in the context of mental budgeting have used similar measures (e.g., Cheema & Soman, 2006;Henderson & Peterson, 1992;Soman, 2001). For subsequent analyses, the item was reverse coded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shoppers recognize the ability of retailers to generate immediate desires and they try to limit this effect by activating some "self-control strategies", which are strategies oriented to control impulsiveness in order to be less conditioned by instore stimuli (Hoch & Loewenstein, 1991;Cheema & Soman, 2006). In particular, in literature, two are the main activities that consumers realize in order to prevent deviant behaviour: reduction of desire and increase of willpower (Hoch & Loewenstein, 1991;Cheema & Soman, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in literature, two are the main activities that consumers realize in order to prevent deviant behaviour: reduction of desire and increase of willpower (Hoch & Loewenstein, 1991;Cheema & Soman, 2006). Self-control is the result of a psychological conflict between desire and willpower, considered as the strategy used to reduce cravings.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they are also driven by other-regarding preferences like fairness or reciprocity when making decisions. Many examples of such behavior exist in the context of consumption activities: heuristics and mental accounts influence product choice (Cheema and Soman 2006), prosocial behavior affects donations or volunteering (Meier and Stutzer 2008), and status and habits drive consumption (Lindbeck 1997). Behavioral economists have opened the way to alternative models of behavior which adjust or replace the rational, maximization model and its predictions, such as prospect theory, hyperbolic discounting, heuristics, habitual behavior, status seeking, self-identity concerns, and theories involving social preferences.…”
Section: An Overview Of Bounded Rationality and Other-regarding Prefementioning
confidence: 99%