1974
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-197400620-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammalian Muscle Receptors and Their Central Actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
606
3
5

Year Published

1974
1974
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 534 publications
(643 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
24
606
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Five imps/s was considered to be a minimally important difference because this change in muscle spindle discharge frequency likely represents a 1.25 mm change of muscle length (17). The effect of conditioning duration on ΔMIF or ΔMF was compared with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using a randomized complete block design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five imps/s was considered to be a minimally important difference because this change in muscle spindle discharge frequency likely represents a 1.25 mm change of muscle length (17). The effect of conditioning duration on ΔMIF or ΔMF was compared with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using a randomized complete block design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential advantages of feedback control of voluntary movements by means of muscle spindles are well recognized (Merton, 1953;Matthews, 1972Matthews, , 1981Prochazka & Hulliger, 1983). However, a clear appreciation of the actual role of muscle spindles in any given type of movement has always been hampered because of uncertainties regarding the patterns of activity occurring in the ã_motor supply, which can dramatically alter the response of primary and secondary spindle afferents to muscle length changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7B) which might not have been related to the stretch reflex mechanism. However, the EMG voltage during stretch increased with the tension increase and therefore guarantees that the tension increase was due to a neural mechanism and not caused simply by the length-tension characteristics of the muscle, which would have produced a pseudo-stretch reflex (Matthews, 1972). This effect is clearly illustrated in the integrated EMG traces of Figure 3a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%