2018
DOI: 10.1111/mam.12121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammals and meaningful taxonomic units: the debate about species concepts and conservation

Abstract: Mammalian taxonomy based on the diagnosability version of the Phylogenetic Species Concept has recently been declared the only sound approach to mammalian classification. In this article, based on the underlying evolutionary ontology of species taxa, I explain the fallacy of these arguments and hold that in a 'grey area' after lineage sundering, completely objective species delimitation is impossible, making both lumping and splitting equally correct or incorrect. As a consequence, we may have to get used to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Among mammals, the diagnostic potential of the Phylogenetic Species Concept has often implied premature splittings, particularly in ungulates (Groves & Grubb , Valdez , Zachos ). This is particularly evident for Eurasian goat‐antelopes (Bovidae: Caprinae: Rupicaprini), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Among mammals, the diagnostic potential of the Phylogenetic Species Concept has often implied premature splittings, particularly in ungulates (Groves & Grubb , Valdez , Zachos ). This is particularly evident for Eurasian goat‐antelopes (Bovidae: Caprinae: Rupicaprini), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, we cannot exclude that taxonomical errors, such as the presence of cryptic species Bickford et al (2007) or inappropriate descriptions of new taxa (Komarek and Beutel 2006; Zachos 2018), could propagate into our conclusions. However, compared to other clades, the mammalian taxonomy is undeniably quite well studied, and, additionally, the families here considered encompass a varied number of documented species (minimum: 7, maximum: 690, mean: 129 spp).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This and other publications dealing with the inherent limitations of taxonomy (e.g. Zachos et al 2013, Zachos 2018a) stir reactions that appear to follow a common pattern: an outcry from the taxonomic community who consider that we disparage taxonomy as a science, insist that taxonomy is a hypothesis-driven discipline and claim that our views threaten the freedom of scientific research (see the comments on in the correspondence section of Nature as well as Raposo et al 2017, Thomson et al 2018, Gippoliti 2019. These arguments generally miss the key points in our various publications (Garnett and Christidis 2018a,b).…”
Section: Background Of the Debatementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, it is a research field in which we are closely involved: Taylor et al (2019) cite the research led by one of us (Christidis et al 2014) as an example of "very high standards of taxonomic description and publication". Nor do our views depend on any particular species concept, although, like Taylor et al (2019), Zachos (2016Zachos ( , 2018a embraced and defended the ontological superiority of the ESC. We therefore ask our critics to look at the first part of the reasoning in our respective publications, i.e.…”
Section: Background Of the Debatementioning
confidence: 98%