2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammographic Assessment of a Geographically Defined Population at a Mastology Referral Hospital in São Paulo Brazil

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate the results of screening and diagnostic mammography in a geographically defined population attending a regional mastology referral hospital of the State Public Service of São Paulo.MethodsA total of 7508 women, who received screening or diagnostic mammography examinations from 06/2004 to 06/2005, with follow-up until 06/2006, were included in this study. Data corresponding to age, the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), biopsy, surgery and the stage of breast cancer were co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this was not the study's objective, due to unreliable and/or ignored data (such as positive family history for first and/or second degree relatives, age at which the family member was diagnosed with breast CA, verified mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, and diagnosis of ovarian CA), it was not possible to perform an adequate analysis of hereditary risk of breast CA. In any case, it may be stated that, from the groups with negative (77 patients), positive (17) and ignored (9) family history, 18 (23.3%), 3 (17.6%) and 4 patients, respectively, were diagnosed with this disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this was not the study's objective, due to unreliable and/or ignored data (such as positive family history for first and/or second degree relatives, age at which the family member was diagnosed with breast CA, verified mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, and diagnosis of ovarian CA), it was not possible to perform an adequate analysis of hereditary risk of breast CA. In any case, it may be stated that, from the groups with negative (77 patients), positive (17) and ignored (9) family history, 18 (23.3%), 3 (17.6%) and 4 patients, respectively, were diagnosed with this disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1992, the American College of Radiology developed a system to standardize mammography reports. This system has been used in Brazil since 1998, according to the guidelines from CBR and FEBRASGO 9 . In order to monitor the quality of diagnostic imaging services performed by MMG, Ordinance No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 There are studies that attempt to evaluate the factors related to non-mammography. [17][18][19][20] Considering biannual mammograms, the authors evaluated a population sample of women over the age of 40 (n=290) from the state of São Paulo and found that non-white elderly women (> 70 years) with low income (≤ 5 minimum salaries) were more likely to fail to undergo mammography. However, in this study, the SUS was responsible only for 28.8% of the population undergoing mammography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection rate was 8.8 cases/1,000 mammograms in asymptomatic patients (screening) and 61.7/1,000 mammograms in symptomatic patients, reflecting a large number of advanced stage at diagnosis in symptomatic women. 20 There is no organized screening in Brazil, but collective mobilization/actions to provide mammography and organized screening models are described. 4,[21][22][23] A collective action to provide mammography performed in the city of Marília (state of São Paulo) yielded 0.84 diagnosed cases/1,000 mammograms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a general manner, the highest incidence rates of breast cancer are observed in West and North Europe, in Australia, New Zealand, and North America (6). One of the most important aspects to be evaluated in Brazil is the distribution of health services in the different regions of the country.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%