Mammography film processor replenishment rate: Bromide level monitoring

Abstract

The effects of the mammography film processing replenishment rate on contrast and speed are studied sensitometrically. Two experiments studied decreasing replenishment rates in the Kodak RP developer and quantified changes in the developer by measuring bromide ion concentrations. First, values of NaBr concentration from 1.7 to 8.4 g/L, achieved by reducing the replenishment rate, were tested with sensitometry strips. Second, the developer replenishment rate of a high volume dedicated mammography processor was reduced by one-third, to 20 cm3/1560 cm2, so that the NaBr concentration rose from 2.0 to 12.36. Sensitometric results for four film types and patient films were tested for changes from standard values as NaBr concentration was restored to 3.31 g/L. Fifty-five clinical images obtained at 7.3-9.3 NaBr g/L were compared to their matching previous films, with NaBr levels of 2-3 g/L, for contrast and visibility of the skin line. For the range of the NaBr ion from 1.7 to 7 g/L, no significant sensitometric differences were found. Above 7 g/L, different film types had different sensitometric results. From 7.3 to 9.3 NaBr g/L, 47.5% of the clinical films reviewed by four radiologists had less contrast compared to previous films. Dedicated mammography processors with high film volume (i.e., those that do not have excessive oxidation or foreign dye problems) can operate at lower replenishment rates than are currently employed. All common mammography film types are stable at these lower replenishment rates up to 7.0 NaBr g/L.

A model for tracking concentration of chemical compounds within a tank of an automatic film processor

“…The old ''rule of thumb'' recommends that the replenishment rates be set at such a level that half a processor's tank volume is replaced within a single day. 7 Such an approach resulted in recommendations that replenishment rates be increased for low volume processors. 5 This philosophy still seems to apply to general radiography and laser film processors, while for low volume mammography processors flooded replenishment algorithms currently appear to be preferred.…”