1999
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99dc35227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammography Grid Performance

Abstract: Differences in grid performance exist. At 25 and 30 kVp, the cellular grid exhibited superior contrast improvement factor performance, whereas one of the linear grids exhibited superior Bucky factor performance. Measured contrast improvement and Bucky factors are dependent on nongrid technique. Cassette tunnels introduce scatter and should not be used with nongrid or magnification techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
2
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
41
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary grid transmission (T p ), which varied between 0.75 and 0.77 for the two systems, increases with the beam energy whereas the total grid transmission (T t ) for PS beams falls from 0.60 to 0.43 with increasing SF in (table 5), consistent with previous work (Rezentes et al 1999, Carton et al 2009, Salvagnini et al 2012. The T s values measured in this study are within the range expected for mammography grids (Shen et al 2006, Aichinger et al 2012.…”
Section: Scatter Fraction In the Image (Sf Out ) And Grid Characterizsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The primary grid transmission (T p ), which varied between 0.75 and 0.77 for the two systems, increases with the beam energy whereas the total grid transmission (T t ) for PS beams falls from 0.60 to 0.43 with increasing SF in (table 5), consistent with previous work (Rezentes et al 1999, Carton et al 2009, Salvagnini et al 2012. The T s values measured in this study are within the range expected for mammography grids (Shen et al 2006, Aichinger et al 2012.…”
Section: Scatter Fraction In the Image (Sf Out ) And Grid Characterizsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The cellular grid implemented here has better performance than the linear grid as expected. The very low scatter found with this set up when comparing with other cellular grid [6] can be attributed to wider septa and interspace. This also eliminates the increased scatter at the edges of CDMAM discussed previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Contrast improvement factors (CIF) of 1.50 and 1.60 was measured for GE and Hologic anti scatter grids respectively. Ratios of CIF between linear and cellular grids found by [6] varies from 0.91 to 0.95 for different thickness of breast phantoms for 30kVp. In this work, the ratio of the CIF values of the GE and Hologic grids is 0.937.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3. Grids [5] designed for mammography reduce scattered radiation and improve subject contrast at the cost of higher breast dose [13,14]. Grids are used for contact (nonmagnification) imaging to reduce noise contributed by scatter.…”
Section: Digital Mammography Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%