“…8 One important analytic and aesthetic problematic that emerges in the course of reading the essays in this section -and one that deserves signifi cant future consideration by medical humanities scholars -is how to understand the relationship between Salisbury's call to stay with the matter of language, and Juler's claim for the 'non-or pre-verbal language of graphic alterity', which he fi nds in Artaud, and which, on Juler's account, represents 'that which is linguistically inexpressible: the haptic, the material, the optical and, above all, the visceral'. 9 The matter of language -and that which lies inside, beyond and before it -has been an enduring concern in the humanities, not least since structuralism and its many theoretical aftermaths. It has been, though, in many respects under-investigated in much medical humanities scholarship.…”