2014
DOI: 10.1177/0305829814541167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Man versus State: Contested Agency in the United Nations

Abstract: The research on international organisations (IOs) continues to be dominated by two distinctions: on the one hand, the distinction between rational choice and social construction; on the other hand, the distinction between IOs as arenas for states and IOs as actors in their own right. In this article I argue that these two distinctions structure not only our theoretical debates on IOs, but also what our theories aspire to explain: political conflicts in IOs. Through an in-depth study of two debates during a con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that its widespread reliance on the Bourdieusian notion of habitus is the main reason why international practice theory has so far struggled with the question of change. 14 For a more general argument about how the same figures of thought structure both the debates of IR and the political practices IR aspires to explain, see Schindler (2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We think that its widespread reliance on the Bourdieusian notion of habitus is the main reason why international practice theory has so far struggled with the question of change. 14 For a more general argument about how the same figures of thought structure both the debates of IR and the political practices IR aspires to explain, see Schindler (2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 For a more general argument about how the same figures of thought structure both the debates of IR and the political practices IR aspires to explain, see Schindler (2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It treats their theories symmetrically; in other words, on par with our own (academic) theories, yet without subscribing to a general relativism concerning the value of the 21 different world views. In doing so, a reflexive and symmetrical approach helps us to understand how IR's own conceptualizations shape international practices (see Schindler 2014).…”
Section: The Need For a Reflexive And Symmetrical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an update is not merely of academic interest, but can also help us better understand and, ultimately, address some of the most pressing problems of contemporary international politics. As the contributions to this special issue demonstrate, the question of who can act is often a highly contested political issue, linked to attributions of moral responsibility, legal obligation and political representation (see also Schindler 2014). Studying agency as a practical achievement brings into view an aspect of many conflicts that is too often ignored, namely that they are about the identity and agency of those who are engaged in them (see Ringmar 1996a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See e.g. Passoth and Rowland (2010) and Schindler (2014). 2 See in particular Doty (1997) for a summary and critique.…”
Section: çO Theo Ry : a Rel Ati O N Al Acco U N T O F Agen Cymentioning
confidence: 99%