1998
DOI: 10.2307/1313337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managed Flooding for Riparian Ecosystem Restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
141
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
141
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Most notable of such a single high flow was the Glen Canyon flood experiment on the Colorado River below lake Powell (Andrews and Pizzi, 2000), even-though that experiment was designed to mobilize and redistribute sediments rather than as a pure flushing flow. However, there have been only a handful of studies addressing the use of sequential floods (intra-annual and annual) for river restoration (Rulifson and Manooch, 1993;Molles et al, 1998;Robinson et al, 2003). Although incorporated into the Glen Canyon flood study (Shannon et al, 2001;Valdez et al, 2001), few other studies have examined the longitudinal effects of experimental floods below large dams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most notable of such a single high flow was the Glen Canyon flood experiment on the Colorado River below lake Powell (Andrews and Pizzi, 2000), even-though that experiment was designed to mobilize and redistribute sediments rather than as a pure flushing flow. However, there have been only a handful of studies addressing the use of sequential floods (intra-annual and annual) for river restoration (Rulifson and Manooch, 1993;Molles et al, 1998;Robinson et al, 2003). Although incorporated into the Glen Canyon flood study (Shannon et al, 2001;Valdez et al, 2001), few other studies have examined the longitudinal effects of experimental floods below large dams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta limitación obliga a la utilización de modelos hidrológicos para la reconstrucción de los regímenes naturales de caudales, ocasionando una serie de errores e incertidumbres, máximo cuando no existen datos en la misma corriente para su verificación. La importancia de comprender el significado hidrológico, geomorfológico, la hidráulica fluvial, las características biológicas de las especies (Arthington et al, 1992;Poff et al, 1997;Molles et al, 1998), son necesarios para la implementación de los caudales ecológicos en México, esto llevó a diferentes instituciones en el 2010 a realizar un esfuerzo para identificar las reservas potencial de agua, en el Programa Nacional de Reservas de Aguas (PNRA) (CONAGUA, 2011), que derivó en la norma NMX-AA-159- SCFI-2012(DOF, 2012, que establece el procedimiento para la determinación del caudal ecológico en cuencas hidrológicas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…, este es el caudal formador de cauce (bankfull), se presenta principalmente durante el periodo de lluvias, este volumen de agua es necesario para preservar las riberas, el caudal de bankfull conserva la forma física del cauce, remueve los sedimentos de arenas, gravas y rocas, previniendo la invasión de la vegetación de ribera, después de un periodo de caudales bajos el caudal de bankfull funciona como un limpiador natural restaurando la calidad de agua en el río ver Tabla 3 (Molles et al, 1998;Bunn & Arthington, 2002).…”
Section: Métodos Hidrológicosunclassified
“…Initiated during the third management phase was a rational shift surrounding riparian ecosystem restoration [73,74]. Despite the timing in this shift, much of the resulting impacts on the vegetation did not become apparent until the fourth phase, 1999-2014.…”
Section: The Fourth Management Phase: 1999-2014mentioning
confidence: 99%