2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
116
2
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
12
116
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in this study, the superiority of covered stent implantation over prolonged balloon inflation in reaching haemostasis was shown, and multiple methods of treatment were required in an attempt to achieve haemostasis in 39.3% 4 of patients. Grade III is the most dangerous form of perforation, associated with rates of cardiac tamponade as high as 40%, and the need for emergency CABG is reportedly between 20% and 40% 5,6 . In our case, we did not manage to achieve adequate haemostasis by prolonged balloon inflation; therefore, prompt implantation of a PTFE stent, along with a pericardial drain, was required to resolve this iatrogenic complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in this study, the superiority of covered stent implantation over prolonged balloon inflation in reaching haemostasis was shown, and multiple methods of treatment were required in an attempt to achieve haemostasis in 39.3% 4 of patients. Grade III is the most dangerous form of perforation, associated with rates of cardiac tamponade as high as 40%, and the need for emergency CABG is reportedly between 20% and 40% 5,6 . In our case, we did not manage to achieve adequate haemostasis by prolonged balloon inflation; therefore, prompt implantation of a PTFE stent, along with a pericardial drain, was required to resolve this iatrogenic complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case also guide wire was in false lumen. However, in most cases, it does not result in tamponade, unlike our case, and can be managed conservatively [7]. In patients where extravasation is located in the wall of epicardial artery, stent-graft can be used effectively to cover the perforation [8].…”
Section: /5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) Coronary artery perforation can be classified according to the findings of coronary angiography. Type I perforation is defined as the development of an extraluminal crater without extravasation, type II as a pericardial or myocardial blush without contrast jet extravasation, type III as extravasation through frank (>1 mm) perforation, and cavity spilling as perforation into an anatomic cavity chamber.…”
Section: )2)mentioning
confidence: 99%