Management Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer During the Global Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic requires to conscientiously weigh “timely surgical intervention” for colorectal cancer against efforts to conserve hospital resources and protect patients and health care providers. Summary Background Data: Professional societies provided ad-hoc guidance at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic on deferral of surgical and perioperative interventions, but these lack specific parameters to determine the optimal timing of surgery. Methods: Using the GRADE system, published evidence was analyzed to generate weighted statements for stage, site, acuity of presentation, and hospital setting to specify when surgery should be pursued, the time and duration of oncologically acceptable delays, and when to utilize nonsurgical modalities to bridge the waiting period. Results: Colorectal cancer surgeries—prioritized as emergency, urgent with imminent emergency or oncologically urgent, or elective—were matched against the phases of the pandemic. Surgery in COVID-19-positive patients must be avoided. Emergent and imminent emergent cases should mostly proceed unless resources are exhausted. Standard practices allow for postponement of elective cases and deferral to nonsurgical modalities of stage II/III rectal and metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncologically urgent cases may be delayed for 6(–12) weeks without jeopardizing oncological outcomes. Outside established principles, administration of nonsurgical modalities is not justified and increases the vulnerability of patients. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has stressed already limited health care resources and forced rationing, triage, and prioritization of care in general, specifically of surgical interventions. Established guidelines allow for modifications of optimal timing and type of surgery for colorectal cancer during an unrelated pandemic.

Postoperative mortality among surgical patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…A total of 715 articles were identified from different databases and 45 articles were selected for evaluation after the successive screening. Twenty-three articles with 2947 participants were included and the rest were excluded with reasons [ 34 , 37 – 40 , 56 , 59 – 74 ] (Fig. 1 ).…”

Colorectal screening: We have not caught up. A surge of colorectal cancer after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic?

“…Several guidelines were rapidly published to help guide surgeons and gastroenterologists in their decision making. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 …”

Colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak: do we need to change?

“…To date, possible implications of the changes proposed to cancer management pathways during the COVID-19 pandemic on the prognosis of cancer patients are poorly understood. The concept of postponing surgery after the pandemic or using other treatment modalities is challenged by inconsistent results of the studies published before COVID-19 pandemic assessing survival according to different ranges of delay in surgical resection [ 13 – 16 ]. Furthermore, the end of COVID-19 pandemic is far from being defined.…”