2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management implications of tree growth patterns in miombo woodlands of Zambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to mention that both B. madagascariensis and P. angolensis are species of the same forest formation and belong to the same family (Fabaceae) but to different ecological groups: the first is a late-climax secondary species whereas the latter is a pioneer species (GONÇALVES et al, 2017;CHITECULO;SUROVY 2018), in other words, ecological strategies are different to obtain better results for species growth and survival (WILLIAMS et al, 2008;CHIDUMAYO, 2013). Chidumayo (2019) report different strategies of trees in the Miombo canopy where he found that most pioneer species grow slower in the initial stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that both B. madagascariensis and P. angolensis are species of the same forest formation and belong to the same family (Fabaceae) but to different ecological groups: the first is a late-climax secondary species whereas the latter is a pioneer species (GONÇALVES et al, 2017;CHITECULO;SUROVY 2018), in other words, ecological strategies are different to obtain better results for species growth and survival (WILLIAMS et al, 2008;CHIDUMAYO, 2013). Chidumayo (2019) report different strategies of trees in the Miombo canopy where he found that most pioneer species grow slower in the initial stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, more efforts are needed to investigate the vegetation dynamics, anthropogenic and environmental drivers as well as the different conservation management strategies across Miombo and Mopane countries. Examples of such efforts include the recent work of, (i) Chiteculo and Surovy [46] and Chiteculo et al [47], that characterized the vegetation composition and structure and deforestation patterns of the Miombo woodlands in the Huambo province, Angola, respectively; (ii) Ribeiro et al [6] that conducted a 12-year analysis of the spatio-temporal patterns of fire to refine the fire management strategy in one of the most pristine areas of Miombo, the Niassa National Reserve, Mozambique; (iii) Mugasha et al [48] that provided a pioneer study on modeling tree growth in the Miombo woodlands from Tanzania based on long-term monitoring data; and (iii) Chidumayo [49] that performed a long-term study (1982–2018) across the Miombo woodlands in Zambia to investigate the woodland drivers and contribute to the design of management plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review focuses on Southern Africa because there is a gap in knowledge on carbon storage, biomass, and the long-term trend of forest distribution and degradation in dryland forests. Much of the research on dryland forests in Southern African has concentrated on livelihoods, ecosystem services, energy supply and demand, food security, livelihoods and community forest management, and conservation/ development trade-offs (e.g., Chidumayo and Marunda 2010, Chidumayo and Gumbo 2010, Chidumayo 2019, Djoudi et al 2015, Dewees 1994, Du Preez 2014, Ryan et al 2016, leaving forests highly vulnerable to deforestation and degradation (Keenan 2015). The social and economic aspects are important given the large numbers of African people that rely on dry forests for their livelihoods and a range of goods and services.…”
Section: Review Focus Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%