2011
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2011.890.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Bacterial Blight of Pomegranate Through Chemicals/ Antibiotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disease agent has been reported as the reason for reduction of the domestic and export pomegranate production by 80% in India (Ravikumar et al . ; Poovarasan et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disease agent has been reported as the reason for reduction of the domestic and export pomegranate production by 80% in India (Ravikumar et al . ; Poovarasan et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…punicae is the only bacterial disease of pomegranate in the world (Akhtar and Bhatti 1992;Petersen et al 2010;Poovarasan et al 2013). Disease agent has been reported as the reason for reduction of the domestic and export pomegranate production by 80% in India (Ravikumar et al 2011;Poovarasan et al 2013). Currently, there is no published study for the galls or knots caused by disease agent(s) or Psv on pomegranate trees worldwide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recently, Kumar et al (2016) studied the copper fungicides with combination antibiotics significantly inhibit the growth of pathogen under both conditions (in vitro and in vivo). Many authors also studied the significance role of alone antibiotics and combination with copper fungicides to control plant pathogenic bacteria in different crops (Raju et al 2011;Ravi kumar et al, 2011;Lokesh et al, 2013). E. chrysanthemi pv.…”
Section: Cultural Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, conducted field study for two years for evaluation of Sudo (Pseudomonas fluorescens) for control of bacterial blight and other leaf diseases. Results compiled revealed that soil application of Sudo @ 1.0 ml/L as drenching at root zone + foliar spray @ 2.0 ml/L recorded less bacterial blight severity of 14 33. and 13.32 PDI on leaves and 20.60 and 19.54 PDI on fruits during first and second year respectively as compared to 37.26 and 35.73 PDI on leaves and 28.33 and 35.22 PDI on fruits in control plants respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%