2023
DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of chronic HBV‐HDV patients chronic HBV‐HDV infection: A review on new management options

María Buti,
Alexia Gonzalez,
Mar Riveiro‐Barciela
et al.

Abstract: Hepatitis D virus was first described by Mario Rizzeto in 1977, and it is considered chronic viral hepatitis with the poorest prognosis. Despite its discovery almost 50 years ago, progress in its diagnosis and treatment has been scarce until recent years. The approval of bulevirtide has shed some light for patients with Chronic Hepatitis D, although important gaps regarding its use in therapy as well as about the epidemiology and diagnosis of the disease need to be addressed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were also best in the groups of patients treated with lonafarnib in combination with pegylated interferon alpha 2a. [ 21 ] Nucleic acid polymers and pegylated lambda interferon are other possible future options [ 21 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results were also best in the groups of patients treated with lonafarnib in combination with pegylated interferon alpha 2a. [ 21 ] Nucleic acid polymers and pegylated lambda interferon are other possible future options [ 21 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were also best in the groups of patients treated with lonafarnib in combination with pegylated interferon alpha 2a. [21] Nucleic acid polymers and pegylated lambda interferon are other possible future options [21] No response-guided study on the treatment of HDV/HBV infection with pegylated interferon alpha 2a has been published to date. Our study has the advantage of a complete follow-up of the patients for four years and two years of monitoring after the end of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%