2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of distal radius fractures: Treatment protocol and functional results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors concluded that best treatment option is dependent on type of fracture, extent of metaphyseal comminution, quality of the bone, and the medical condition of the patient. [23] Others concluded that conservative treatment remains the safest option in most cases. [24] In the present meta-analysis, no significant difference between internal fixation and conservative treatment were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors concluded that best treatment option is dependent on type of fracture, extent of metaphyseal comminution, quality of the bone, and the medical condition of the patient. [23] Others concluded that conservative treatment remains the safest option in most cases. [24] In the present meta-analysis, no significant difference between internal fixation and conservative treatment were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 There is a general perception that open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates is superior to casting for the younger population, especially for comminuted and intra-articular fractures. [5][6][7] However, there is a paucity of high-grade evidence demonstrating whether these findings can be translated to the elderly population. Our group's recent systematic review of DRF treatment in the elderly found that, although radiographic outcomes were worse following casting, there were no differences in functional outcomes compared to surgical treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several treatment options ranging from close reduction and cast application, external fixation with or without k-wire fixation, open reduction and internal fixation to more recently segment specific fixation have been done for these fractures. The best treatment option for these fractures is still debatable with advantages and disadvantages of each modality of treatment [1][2][3][4] . Close reduction and cast application has long been considered to be a good option for distal radius fractures in low demand patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close reduction and cast application has long been considered to be a good option for distal radius fractures in low demand patients. Some restriction of function has been an inevitable outcome of conservative treatment [2,3] . External fixation with or without k-wire fixation has consistently shown better results in comminuted intra-articular fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%