1969
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196912000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of extensor tendon injuries of the hand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the White system and one part of the Buck-Gramcko system were designed to assess the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon, the TAM system was designed to assess finger flexor function. We also considered use of the Dargan system of assessment, which was introduced to assess the results of extensor tendon injuries of the fingers (Dargan, 1969) and has been used in one previous study which included EPL repairs (Ip and Chow, 1997). In a previous study (Khandwala et al, 2000), we found that the pulp to palm distances, which are the basis of the flexion assessment in this system, are so unreliable that we abandoned its use.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the White system and one part of the Buck-Gramcko system were designed to assess the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon, the TAM system was designed to assess finger flexor function. We also considered use of the Dargan system of assessment, which was introduced to assess the results of extensor tendon injuries of the fingers (Dargan, 1969) and has been used in one previous study which included EPL repairs (Ip and Chow, 1997). In a previous study (Khandwala et al, 2000), we found that the pulp to palm distances, which are the basis of the flexion assessment in this system, are so unreliable that we abandoned its use.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the only other paper describing substantial numbers of patients, Ip and Chow (1997) reported a series of 37 complete EPL injuries in a paper predominantly concerned with injuries to the extensor tendons of the fingers. Several other authors also included the EPL in papers on the finger extensors but reported much smaller numbers of EPL injuries (Table 1) (Allieu et al, 1984(Allieu et al, , 1988Dargan, 1969;Evans et al, 1995;Evans, 1995;Hung et al, 1990;Lemke et al, 1984;Marin-Braun et al, 1989;Newport et al, 1990;Regnard et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAM, 15 Dargan's criteria 16 Tables 1-3. Baseline measures were also taken of the non-injured thumb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 The results of each study were examined with regard to ROM using TAM, Miller, Geldmacher, Strickland-Glogovac scales and grip strength. [25][26][27][28][29] The most common assessment scale among all studies over the past 15 years is TAM, which is defined by 24,25 The TAM classification of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand consists of four qualitative distinctions ('Excellent', 'Good', 'Fair' and 'Poor'), which correspond to the percentage of motion of the unaffected hand. Specifically, 'Excellent' was deemed to be a percent motion in the injured side that is similar to the uninjured side.…”
Section: Management Classification and Outcomes Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%