2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of flexibility in projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
135
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
135
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our first contribution is to extend earlier work (by Chapman & Ward, 2011;Martinsuo et al, 2014;Olsson, 2006;Pich et al, 2002;Vidal, 2015) to proffer three approaches that project managers adopt when confronting project uncertainty -structural, behavioural and relational. These three approaches are complementary rather than competing; with a combination of all three required to deal with emerging uncertainties before they negatively impact on project delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our first contribution is to extend earlier work (by Chapman & Ward, 2011;Martinsuo et al, 2014;Olsson, 2006;Pich et al, 2002;Vidal, 2015) to proffer three approaches that project managers adopt when confronting project uncertainty -structural, behavioural and relational. These three approaches are complementary rather than competing; with a combination of all three required to deal with emerging uncertainties before they negatively impact on project delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…on intermediate containers for ready-mixed concrete); • the possibility of application of the principles of functioning flexible production systems in the concrete industry (Reichelt 1987); • adjustment of the concept of flexible production, previously connected with diverse activities (e.g. from designing and prototype production to computer-controlled manufacturing) to the construction industry (Halpin 1988), upon the example of processing stone materials; • the activities aimed at reduction of non-homogeneity by the superposition of construction processes, illustrated with examples concerning production concentration; • flexibility principles applicable to organizational strategy (Volberda 1999) by pointing out the reasons for using flexibility under changing conditions of execution; • Conception of product and process flexibility in semiconductor fabrication facility management (Gil et al 2005) giving some examples of potential flexibility tactics on tactical and operational level; • application of flexibility in managing construction projects (Olsson 2006) focusing principally on flexibility strategies at the tactical level; • indication of the need to balance the dynamics of the environment with the dynamics of management on the construction site (Telem et al 2006); • indication of both external and internal uncertainty factors justifying the application of flexibility (Mayer and Kazakidis 2007) in relation to the mining industry; • the new approach to uncertainty (and risk) as an element of development (Perminova, Gustafsson, Wikstrom 2008) which requires the management based on 3 key elements: learning from examples and sense-making as enablers of flexibility and quick decisionmaking in response to the analyzed situation. The purpose of the proposed method is to limit the impact of interruptions on planning and realization of building processes through introducing multiple variants of realization methods.…”
Section: Fundamentals Purpose Of the Proposed Methods And Potential Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olsson (2006) shows the need for tactical flexibility within a defined strategy, and Samset (Chapter 2) points out the danger in seeking predictability. He warns that "prediction [can] become a prescription…it shifts the decision-maker's focus from finding the 13 best solution to …[making] his own idea or prescription come true".…”
Section: Governance In a Turbulent Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%