2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2248-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of growing vestibular schwannomas

Abstract: Conservative management of small vestibular schwannomas is frequently proposed as most tumours do not grow. Anyway, tumour growth is reported in 30-40 % of the cases, so that surgery is consequently generally proposed. We primarily observed 161 patients affected by unilateral vestibular schwannomas. All patients were examined by means of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans. Tumour growth was recorded in 58 cases (35.8 %) and these subjects set up the group of study. Twenty-two (37.9 %) patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, modern patient counseling and the observation treatment paradigm presuppose a saltatory growth pattern of sporadic VS. Substantiating this, large population-based data demonstrate that 75% of IAC tumors and almost 60% of CPA tumors exhibit no evidence of tumor growth after 10 years of observation (15). Moreover, it has been recently demonstrated in a volumetric analysis of 85 patients, as well as previously observed in a subgroup of 20 patients undergoing observation who demonstrated growth but could not undergo treatment, that not all patients who previously demonstrated tumor growth experience continued growth over time (16,17). Taken together, the primary conclusion of the current study—that growth detected during observation does not necessarily portend future growth—should not be overly surprising.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this way, modern patient counseling and the observation treatment paradigm presuppose a saltatory growth pattern of sporadic VS. Substantiating this, large population-based data demonstrate that 75% of IAC tumors and almost 60% of CPA tumors exhibit no evidence of tumor growth after 10 years of observation (15). Moreover, it has been recently demonstrated in a volumetric analysis of 85 patients, as well as previously observed in a subgroup of 20 patients undergoing observation who demonstrated growth but could not undergo treatment, that not all patients who previously demonstrated tumor growth experience continued growth over time (16,17). Taken together, the primary conclusion of the current study—that growth detected during observation does not necessarily portend future growth—should not be overly surprising.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Two intrameatal cases showed no growth after initial growth. As shown by some authors, a mixed growth pattern could be indicative to proceed with further W&S [Ferri et al, 2012;Patnaik et al, 2015].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…While most papers considered an increase in extra-canalicular diameter as growth, 17,19,20,22–29,31,32,35,40 some studies used an increase in tumour volume or volume doubling time. 34 Even when diameter was considered, some papers defined growth as 2 mm or more per year, 17,19,22,23,25,29,33,36 while others defined it as 1 mm or more. 20,27,31,37 The time interval used to measure growth was also variable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,27,31,37 The time interval used to measure growth was also variable. While most considered growth per annum, 19,20,22,23,25,27,29,31,33,36,37 others considered the growth between two successive scans, 17,26,32,38,39 although imaging is not always conducted at one-year intervals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation