2023
DOI: 10.21037/cco-22-115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review

Abstract: Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive primary hepatic malignancy, which has increased in incidence over the past decades. While surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with early-staged disease, many patients present with locally advanced and unresectable tumors. Given the importance of locoregional control and the potential for downstaging to resectability, knowledge of advances in the management of locally advanced ICC is critical for optimizing outcomes.Methods a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 94 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the most optimal treatment for ICC is surgical resection. Due to the poor prognoses of patients who are unsuitable for surgical treatment, some researchers and guidelines have attempted to expand the indications for surgery in locally advanced ICC [ 17 , [24] , [25] ]. In comparison to palliative chemotherapy, hepatectomy was correlated to a more favorable long-term outcome for locally advanced ICC (3-year OS rate: 40.8 % VS. 5.5 %, P = 0.007) [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the most optimal treatment for ICC is surgical resection. Due to the poor prognoses of patients who are unsuitable for surgical treatment, some researchers and guidelines have attempted to expand the indications for surgery in locally advanced ICC [ 17 , [24] , [25] ]. In comparison to palliative chemotherapy, hepatectomy was correlated to a more favorable long-term outcome for locally advanced ICC (3-year OS rate: 40.8 % VS. 5.5 %, P = 0.007) [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%