2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.mou.0000186843.02388.9a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of male incontinence following artificial urinary sphincter failure

Abstract: We believe that continence can be salvaged in the majority of men in whom the device fails or requires explantation and we present the logical analysis for device revision and relocation in this review.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several causes of persistent and/ or recurrent UI: unsuitable or accidental pump operation, urinary tract infection (UTI) with detrusor overactivity, overactive bladder, urethral atrophy, urethral erosion of the cuff, inadequate cuff size, insufficient pressure of the reservoir balloon, development (recurrence) of urethral or bladder neck stenosis, as well as device failure with fluid loss or obstruction of the control unit flow. 12,14,15 Revision rates between 8 and 45% have been reported due to mechanical failure, while those derived from nonmechanical complications such as erosion, urethral atrophy and infections are reported between 7 and 17%. 1,[16][17][18] Certain complications have been described, with the most significant being erosion and/or extrusion of the sphincter, infection and urethral atrophy.…”
Section: The Guidelines Project An Initiative Of the Brazilian Medicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several causes of persistent and/ or recurrent UI: unsuitable or accidental pump operation, urinary tract infection (UTI) with detrusor overactivity, overactive bladder, urethral atrophy, urethral erosion of the cuff, inadequate cuff size, insufficient pressure of the reservoir balloon, development (recurrence) of urethral or bladder neck stenosis, as well as device failure with fluid loss or obstruction of the control unit flow. 12,14,15 Revision rates between 8 and 45% have been reported due to mechanical failure, while those derived from nonmechanical complications such as erosion, urethral atrophy and infections are reported between 7 and 17%. 1,[16][17][18] Certain complications have been described, with the most significant being erosion and/or extrusion of the sphincter, infection and urethral atrophy.…”
Section: The Guidelines Project An Initiative Of the Brazilian Medicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate cuff deflation and/or inadvertent activation of the locking mechanism can lead to incomplete bladder emptying and subsequent overflow incontinence. Fortunately, failure of the sphincteric cuff to inflate and deflate on activation of AUS device in the early postoperative period is extremely rare [2,3,8,9]. A poorly placed control pump in the scrotum can be accidentally compressed and cause unintentional cuff deflation and UI.…”
Section: Improper Operation Of Aus Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, tissue atrophy is probably the most common cause of non-mechanical failure and also the most common cause for AUS revision [4,7,9]. Since 1987, the incidence of tissue atrophy has decreased considerably with the introduction of a narrow-backed cuff [2,3].…”
Section: Tissue Atrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Any problems would be reversed, in most cases, for simple or surgical outpatient review, which would ensure good continence rates, according to the criteria of effectiveness adopted by different authors (Hussain et al 2005;Mundy, 1991;Vilar et al 2004;Webster & Sherman, 2005).…”
Section: Alternatives To the Ams 800 In The Treatment Of Urinary Incomentioning
confidence: 99%